On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> > >> I think the current state is that HBase is not as stable as Hadoop :) >> Hopefully 0.92 or 0.94 will fix this - then let's talk about calling >> it 1.0. > > > Well if we are good with that characterization, then leaving HBase versioning > at 0.X makes sense.
I'm all for fixing the characterization, but the way to do it is to stabilize it, not by just branding it differently. Like Karthik said, I'm for a 1.0 but it should have a testing/burn-in period with no major changes for a while. If major changes are needed to fix bugs, then the base code/design isn't yet solid enough and we aren't ready for 1.0. -Todd > > Best regards, > > - Andy > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
