+1. Either of the terms is cool by me. Good suggestion! -Todd
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Jonathan Gray <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Nicolas Spiegelberg <[email protected]> > wrote: >> +1 >> >> On 12/5/11 4:28 PM, "Doug Meil" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>>Hi folks- >>> >>>Sorry to reopen this, but hopefully only briefly. I'm fine with renaming >>>it something else "not book", but in taking a few samples of others would >>>anybody object to it being called "Reference Guide"? "Reference Manual" >>>is ok too. But I must admit I'm partial to "Reference Guide." >>> >>>Other ExamplesŠ >>> >>>"Berkeley DB Programmer's Reference Guide" >>>http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17076_02/html/programmer_reference/index.html >>> >>>"ZooKeeper Programmer's Guide" >>>http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/trunk/zookeeperProgrammers.html >>> >>>"MySQL Reference Manual" >>>http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/ >>> >>>Oracle RDBMS >>>http://www.oracle.com/pls/db111/homepage >>>(Developer's Guide, Java Developer's Guide, Administrator's Guide, >>>Security Guide, etc.) >>> >>> >>> >>>Doug Meil >>>Chief Software Architect, Explorys >>>[email protected] >>> >> -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
