Thanks everybody! "Reference Guide" it is.
On 12/6/11 2:23 AM, "Todd Lipcon" <[email protected]> wrote: >+1. Either of the terms is cool by me. Good suggestion! > >-Todd > >On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Jonathan Gray <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Nicolas Spiegelberg >><[email protected]> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> On 12/5/11 4:28 PM, "Doug Meil" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Hi folks- >>>> >>>>Sorry to reopen this, but hopefully only briefly. I'm fine with >>>>renaming >>>>it something else "not book", but in taking a few samples of others >>>>would >>>>anybody object to it being called "Reference Guide"? "Reference >>>>Manual" >>>>is ok too. But I must admit I'm partial to "Reference Guide." >>>> >>>>Other ExamplesŠ >>>> >>>>"Berkeley DB Programmer's Reference Guide" >>>>http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17076_02/html/programmer_reference/index.htm >>>>l >>>> >>>>"ZooKeeper Programmer's Guide" >>>>http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/trunk/zookeeperProgrammers.html >>>> >>>>"MySQL Reference Manual" >>>>http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/ >>>> >>>>Oracle RDBMS >>>>http://www.oracle.com/pls/db111/homepage >>>>(Developer's Guide, Java Developer's Guide, Administrator's Guide, >>>>Security Guide, etc.) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Doug Meil >>>>Chief Software Architect, Explorys >>>>[email protected] >>>> >>> > > > >-- >Todd Lipcon >Software Engineer, Cloudera >
