So it looks like I must have just caught a region as it was moving or something. I can't seem to re-produce that error. So I'm fully +1. Sorry for the false alarm.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@stumbleupon.com> wrote: > I'm +1'ish > > Spun up a 0.92.1 cluster wrote some data. Then spun up a 0.92.2RC and > everything worked. > Ran LoadTestTool while killing region servers. Everything recovered well. > Ran PerformanceEvaluation everything went well > > > However when trying to manually split a table while tests were running > I was unable to. On investigating more I found that manual splits > appear to be broken in 0.92. So I filed HBASE-6767. I don't think > it's enough to sink the rc but it was something that I noticed. > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> We're having more and more releases across 0.92, 0.94 and soon 0.96 >> branches. >> It would be wise to revisit the historical convention. >> >> Thanks for bringing this up, J-D. >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans >> <jdcry...@apache.org>wrote: >> >>> > Usually it takes 3 +1s by committers. Maybe hang a little while to >>> > get another one or so? >>> >>> Little nit, it's actually 3 PMC members. Historically committers were >>> also PMC members but this changed recently. >>> >>> I'm referring to http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>> >>> We may want to eventually do like Hadoop and have our own bylaws: >>> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html >>> >>> J-D >>>
