Tried out the 0.92.2 RC1. Started one Master and two RS. Inserted data, scanned the data. Issued split operations. Restarted RS, restarted Master, split logs worked fine - got back the data. These are the steps we carried out to test the RC. Thanks to RajeshBabu for helping out in this test.
So +1 from my side on the RC. Regards Ram > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Yu [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:46 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is > available for download > > Stack: > I take your and J-D's advice. > > Cheers > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I went through the following thread: > > > Re: ANN: The 2nd hbase 0.94.1 release candidate is available for > download > > > > > > I didn't see 3 binding +1's on that RC. > > > > > > > So, Ted, why would you even go back to the old releases to do the > > above count up of votes? > > > > Are you trying to find fault or holes in the guidance your fellow > > committers are giving you? > > > > FYI, that's how it comes across. > > > > Its understood that you might mess up RMing given this the first time > > you are going about it. We're here to help you over the unknowns > (You > > might have done a bit of background reading and research on how > > previous releases were run, but its fine if you didn't. We'll > > survive). > > > > I'd suggest though going forward that you trust the counsel of your > > fellow committers, especially when doing something you've plainly not > > done before. You can always blame them later if it turns out to be > > ill-advice. It'll also make it more likely your fellow committers > > will want to help you out. > > > > St.Ack > >
