That's reasonable to me. Also, given that HBASE-6055 is 'Snapshots in 0.96' (at the moment), seems fine to make the association.
-Jesse ------------------- Jesse Yates @jesse_yates jyates.github.com On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all, > > We've started (or will very soon start) committing patches to a github repo > for the snapshot branch (https://github.com/jyates/hbase/tree/snapshots, > likely other forks coming). I've added a component for snapshots to the > jira. I'm considering adding a version (likely the 'hbase-6055' > version/branch) so that when snapshot sub-issues get committed to the > branch, we resolve with that fix version and not have to worry about > muddling the main '0.96' release version until it is merged in. If for > some reason if this doesn't make 0.96, we wouldn't have to do a jira > cleanup pass. If it does, we just add the 0.96 fix version to all those > issues. > > Does this seem ok? Does the name I'm suggesting seem good? (I considered > 'snapshots' but this is confusing IMO because of SNAPSHOT versions and I > didn't want to tie it to a particular version). > > Thanks, > Jon. > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // Software Engineer, Cloudera > // [email protected] >
