Thanks for the URL, watching. On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Jesse Yates <[email protected]> wrote: > That's reasonable to me. Also, given that HBASE-6055 is 'Snapshots in 0.96' > (at the moment), seems fine to make the association. > > -Jesse > ------------------- > Jesse Yates > @jesse_yates > jyates.github.com > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> We've started (or will very soon start) committing patches to a github repo >> for the snapshot branch (https://github.com/jyates/hbase/tree/snapshots, >> likely other forks coming). I've added a component for snapshots to the >> jira. I'm considering adding a version (likely the 'hbase-6055' >> version/branch) so that when snapshot sub-issues get committed to the >> branch, we resolve with that fix version and not have to worry about >> muddling the main '0.96' release version until it is merged in. If for >> some reason if this doesn't make 0.96, we wouldn't have to do a jira >> cleanup pass. If it does, we just add the 0.96 fix version to all those >> issues. >> >> Does this seem ok? Does the name I'm suggesting seem good? (I considered >> 'snapshots' but this is confusing IMO because of SNAPSHOT versions and I >> didn't want to tie it to a particular version). >> >> Thanks, >> Jon. >> >> -- >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) >> // Software Engineer, Cloudera >> // [email protected] >>
-- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
