Got a lot of failed tests that I have not seen failing at before.
It looks like the test VMs collectively got slower. Testtimes are up from
~45mins to ~70mins
Lots the recent failures are because of tests timing out.
-- Lars
________________________________
From: lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: recent 0.94 failures
Hmm... Also got a successful run now.
Maybe it was a temporary env issue. It is just strange that the same test would
fail twice in a row suddenly, along with other test that have not failed in a
while.
Looking at the runtime of TestMiniClusterLoadParallel on Ubuntu1 it tooK 104s.
In the latest run on Ubuntu5 it took 292s.
In the failed runs it over 500s.
-- Lars
________________________________
From: Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: recent 0.94 failures
I ran the tests 4 rounds and they all passed:
1046 ~/runtest.sh 4
TestLruBlockCache,TestMiniClusterLoadParallel,TestLruBlockCache,TestCompactionState,TestRSKilledWhenMasterInitializing
FYI
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lars:
> Here is what I put in HBASE-7638:
>
> Sergey and I looked at the patch.
> There is no potential for NullPointerException similar to what HBASE-7268
> addendum fixes.
> See deleteCachedLocation():
> {code}
> if (oldLocation != null) {
> isStaleDelete = (source != null) &&
> !oldLocation.equals(source);
> {code}
> I also ran the tests that failed in recent 0.94 builds and they all passed:
>
> 1041 mt -Dtest=TestLruBlockCache,TestMiniClusterLoadParallel
> 1042 mt -Dtest=TestLruBlockCache
> 1043 mt -Dtest=TestCompactionState
> 1044 mt -Dtest=TestRSKilledWhenMasterInitializing
>
> I would also loop the above tests to see if I can get test failure.
>
> I understand it is important to have a green 0.94 build. So whether / what
> to roll back is up to you.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:03 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/
>>
>>
>> Prime suspects are: HBASE-7599 (Devaraj), and HBASE-7638 (Sergey).
>> If anybody has any ideas.
>>
>> Otherwise I'll start with reverting these changes.
>>
>> -- Lars
>>
>
>
