Got a lot of failed tests that I have not seen failing at before. It looks like the test VMs collectively got slower. Testtimes are up from ~45mins to ~70mins
Lots the recent failures are because of tests timing out. -- Lars ________________________________ From: lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 9:26 PM Subject: Re: recent 0.94 failures Hmm... Also got a successful run now. Maybe it was a temporary env issue. It is just strange that the same test would fail twice in a row suddenly, along with other test that have not failed in a while. Looking at the runtime of TestMiniClusterLoadParallel on Ubuntu1 it tooK 104s. In the latest run on Ubuntu5 it took 292s. In the failed runs it over 500s. -- Lars ________________________________ From: Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:34 PM Subject: Re: recent 0.94 failures I ran the tests 4 rounds and they all passed: 1046 ~/runtest.sh 4 TestLruBlockCache,TestMiniClusterLoadParallel,TestLruBlockCache,TestCompactionState,TestRSKilledWhenMasterInitializing FYI On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lars: > Here is what I put in HBASE-7638: > > Sergey and I looked at the patch. > There is no potential for NullPointerException similar to what HBASE-7268 > addendum fixes. > See deleteCachedLocation(): > {code} > if (oldLocation != null) { > isStaleDelete = (source != null) && > !oldLocation.equals(source); > {code} > I also ran the tests that failed in recent 0.94 builds and they all passed: > > 1041 mt -Dtest=TestLruBlockCache,TestMiniClusterLoadParallel > 1042 mt -Dtest=TestLruBlockCache > 1043 mt -Dtest=TestCompactionState > 1044 mt -Dtest=TestRSKilledWhenMasterInitializing > > I would also loop the above tests to see if I can get test failure. > > I understand it is important to have a green 0.94 build. So whether / what > to roll back is up to you. > > Cheers > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:03 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote: > >> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/ >> >> >> Prime suspects are: HBASE-7599 (Devaraj), and HBASE-7638 (Sergey). >> If anybody has any ideas. >> >> Otherwise I'll start with reverting these changes. >> >> -- Lars >> > >