I see some timeout failures of trunk too. May these be produced by the same cause?
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:02 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote: > More failures. Once TestSplitTransactionOnCluster didn't finish. In the last > run TestHBaseFsck did not finish. > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> > To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 7:11 AM > Subject: Re: recent 0.94 failures > > > Looking at https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/771/console : > > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Total time: 44:01.553s > > FYI > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:16 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote: > > Got a lot of failed tests that I have not seen failing at before. >>It looks like the test VMs collectively got slower. Testtimes are up from >>~45mins to ~70mins >> >>Lots the recent failures are because of tests timing out. >> >> >>-- Lars >> >> >> >>________________________________ >> From: lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> >>To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org> >>Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 9:26 PM >> >>Subject: Re: recent 0.94 failures >> >>Hmm... Also got a successful run now. >>Maybe it was a temporary env issue. It is just strange that the same test >>would fail twice in a row suddenly, along with other test that have not >>failed in a while. >> >>Looking at the runtime of TestMiniClusterLoadParallel on Ubuntu1 it tooK >>104s. In the latest run on Ubuntu5 it took 292s. >>In the failed runs it over 500s. >> >>-- Lars >>________________________________ >>From: Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> >>To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> >>Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:34 PM >>Subject: Re: recent 0.94 failures >> >>I ran the tests 4 rounds and they all passed: >>1046 ~/runtest.sh 4 >>TestLruBlockCache,TestMiniClusterLoadParallel,TestLruBlockCache,TestCompactionState,TestRSKilledWhenMasterInitializing >> >>FYI >> >>On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Lars: >>> Here is what I put in HBASE-7638: >>> >>> Sergey and I looked at the patch. >>> There is no potential for NullPointerException similar to what HBASE-7268 >>> addendum fixes. >>> See deleteCachedLocation(): >>> {code} >>> if (oldLocation != null) { >>> isStaleDelete = (source != null) && >>> !oldLocation.equals(source); >>> {code} >>> I also ran the tests that failed in recent 0.94 builds and they all passed: >>> >>> 1041 mt -Dtest=TestLruBlockCache,TestMiniClusterLoadParallel >>> 1042 mt -Dtest=TestLruBlockCache >>> 1043 mt -Dtest=TestCompactionState >>> 1044 mt -Dtest=TestRSKilledWhenMasterInitializing >>> >>> I would also loop the above tests to see if I can get test failure. >>> >>> I understand it is important to have a green 0.94 build. So whether / what >>> to roll back is up to you. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:03 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/ >>>> >>>> >>>> Prime suspects are: HBASE-7599 (Devaraj), and HBASE-7638 (Sergey). >>>> If anybody has any ideas. >>>> >>>> Otherwise I'll start with reverting these changes. >>>> >>>> -- Lars >>>> >>> >>>
