At least I would be curious if any of that could be bottled up and sprinkled on 0.94.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > Should we really worry about that? ;) If it will have been a -30%, it > will have been an issue ;) > > If you want I can run the RandomRead test for the last 12 months, > running a test for every 5 or 10 commits? so we will see when this > happened? > > JM > > 2013/6/21 lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>: > > Is anybody ware of what set of changes would be responsible for giving > 0.95+ a 30% boost in random read performance over 0.94? > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- Lars > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
