Yep, I agree. If we found where the improvement is coming from, having it on 0.94 might be awesome. No more reasons for me to migrate to 0.95 ;)
2013/6/21 Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>: > At least I would be curious if any of that could be bottled up and > sprinkled on 0.94. > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > >> Should we really worry about that? ;) If it will have been a -30%, it >> will have been an issue ;) >> >> If you want I can run the RandomRead test for the last 12 months, >> running a test for every 5 or 10 commits? so we will see when this >> happened? >> >> JM >> >> 2013/6/21 lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>: >> > Is anybody ware of what set of changes would be responsible for giving >> 0.95+ a 30% boost in random read performance over 0.94? >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > -- Lars >> > >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White)
