Yup: Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 22.756 sec
Have you looked at the log to see on what error it fails? J-D On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> wrote: > JD, does TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook work for you? > > I will retry to run it again on 3 different computers to see. > > JM > > 2013/7/1 lars hofhansl <[email protected]>: >> Hah. I let Cody answer here. I didn't like the empty table either, but he >> preferred it. >> >> -- Lars >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl >> <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 10:35 AM >> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available >> for download >> >> >> I ran some PE single node tests on both tars, looked at the web UIs >> and logs. I'm +1 on this RC. >> >> My only nit is the way that HBASE-5083 leaves an empty table if there >> are not backup masters is kinda ugly. >> >> J-D >> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:51 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The 1st 0.94.9 RC is available for download at >>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.9-rc0/ >>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 >>> >>> Like the previous point releases, 0.94.9 is a primarily a bug fix release. >>> This RC is comparatively small with 26 issues resolved against it: >>> [HBASE-8453] - TestImportExport failing again due to configuration >>> issues >>> [HBASE-8494] - TestRemoteAdmin#testClusterStatus should not assume >>> 'requests' does not change >>> [HBASE-8522] - Archived hfiles and old hlogs may be deleted immediately >>> by HFileCleaner, LogCleaner in HMaster >>> [HBASE-8555] - FilterList correctness may be affected by random >>> ordering of sub-filter(list) >>> [HBASE-8590] - [0.94] BlockingMetaScannerVisitor should check for >>> parent meta entry while waiting for split daughter >>> [HBASE-8639] - Poor performance of htable#getscanner in multithreaded >>> environment due to DNS.getDefaultHost() being called in >>> ScannerCallable#prepare() >>> [HBASE-8640] - ServerName in master may not initialize with the >>> configured ipc address of hbase.master.ipc.address >>> [HBASE-8655] - Backport to 94 - HBASE-8346(Prefetching .META. rows in >>> case only when useCache is set to true) >>> [HBASE-8656] - Rpc call may not be notified in SecureClient >>> [HBASE-8671] - Per-region WAL breaks CP backwards compatibility in 0.94 >>> for non-enabled case >>> [HBASE-8684] - Table Coprocessor can't access external HTable by default >>> [HBASE-8700] - IntegrationTestBigLinkedList can fail due to random >>> number collision >>> [HBASE-8724] - [0.94] ExportSnapshot should not use hbase.tmp.dir as a >>> staging dir on hdfs >>> [HBASE-8742] - HTableDescriptor Properties not preserved when cloning >>> [HBASE-8743] - upgrade hadoop-23 version to 0.23.7 >>> [HBASE-8749] - Potential race condition between >>> FSUtils.renameAndSetModifyTime() and HFile/LogCleaner >>> [HBASE-8762] - Performance/operational penalty when calling HTable.get >>> with a list of one Get >>> [HBASE-8783] - RSSnapshotManager.ZKProcedureMemberRpcs may be >>> initialized with the wrong server name >>> [HBASE-5083] - Backup HMaster should have http infoport open with link >>> to the active master >>> [HBASE-8609] - Make the CopyTable support startRow, stopRow options >>> [HBASE-8636] - Backport KeyValue Codec to 0.94 (HBASE-7413) >>> [HBASE-8683] - Add major compaction support in CompactionTool >>> [HBASE-8692] - [AccessController] Restrict HTableDescriptor enumeration >>> [HBASE-8702] - Make WALEditCodec pluggable >>> [HBASE-8504] - HTable.getRegionsInRange() should provide a non-cached >>> API >>> [HBASE-8603] - Backport HBASE-6921 to 0.94 >>> >>> The full list of changes is also available here: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12324431 >>> >>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and vote >>> +1/-1 by July 2nd on whether we should release this as 0.94.9. >>> >>> The release testing spreadsheet is available here: >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGFHaktDR0FqLWdtQWZwdncyVzE3Z2c#gid=0 >>> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so >>> that we can gauge the coverage) >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> -- Lars >>> >>> ps. I will likely be without access to the Internet for the next five days
