Thanks for doing all this work! I did find a pretty high variance between the runs, which may be at issue here.
Maybe there are effects that only show on certain setups (disk drives, ram, jvm version, etc). Maybe we can compare setups offline. -- Lars ----- Original Message ----- From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 9:25 AM Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available for download Ok. I get similar performances between 0.94.7 and 0.94.9 for the randomRead 0.94.7 => 1124179.9ms 0.94.9 => 1110489.3ms I will re-run the tests one by one for all the 0.94.x versions and update my charts... 2013/7/3 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]>: > Ok. Test pass if I run it alone: > > mvn clean test -P runSmallTests -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true > -Dtest=org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook > > ------------------------------------------------------- > T E S T S > ------------------------------------------------------- > Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 11.642 sec > > Results : > > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > > > > And finally passed on another one: > Results : > > Tests run: 1359, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13 > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Total time: 1:33:34.925s > [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jul 02 16:37:59 EDT 2013 > [INFO] Final Memory: 44M/594M > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > So it's all +1 for me. > > JM > > 2013/7/2 Elliott Clark <[email protected]>: >> +1 >> >> untared. >> Checked the sig. >> Ran Ycsb. >> Ran PE. >> upgraded from 94.8. >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: >>> passes fine here too >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 11:22 AM >>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available >>> for download >>> >>> Yup: >>> >>> Running >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook >>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 22.756 sec >>> >>> Have you looked at the log to see on what error it fails? >>> >>> J-D >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> JD, does TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook work for you? >>>> >>>> I will retry to run it again on 3 different computers to see. >>>> >>>> JM >>>> >>>> 2013/7/1 lars hofhansl <[email protected]>: >>>>> Hah. I let Cody answer here. I didn't like the empty table either, but he >>>>> preferred it. >>>>> >>>>> -- Lars >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> >>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 10:35 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is >>>>> available for download >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I ran some PE single node tests on both tars, looked at the web UIs >>>>> and logs. I'm +1 on this RC. >>>>> >>>>> My only nit is the way that HBASE-5083 leaves an empty table if there >>>>> are not backup masters is kinda ugly. >>>>> >>>>> J-D >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:51 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> The 1st 0.94.9 RC is available for download at >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.9-rc0/ >>>>>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 >>>>>> >>>>>> Like the previous point releases, 0.94.9 is a primarily a bug fix >>>>>> release. This RC is comparatively small with 26 issues resolved against >>>>>> it: >>>>>> [HBASE-8453] - TestImportExport failing again due to configuration >>>>>>issues >>>>>> [HBASE-8494] - TestRemoteAdmin#testClusterStatus should not assume >>>>>>'requests' does not change >>>>>> [HBASE-8522] - Archived hfiles and old hlogs may be deleted >>>>>>immediately by HFileCleaner, LogCleaner in HMaster >>>>>> [HBASE-8555] - FilterList correctness may be affected by random >>>>>>ordering of sub-filter(list) >>>>>> [HBASE-8590] - [0.94] BlockingMetaScannerVisitor should check for >>>>>>parent meta entry while waiting for split daughter >>>>>> [HBASE-8639] - Poor performance of htable#getscanner in >>>>>>multithreaded environment due to DNS.getDefaultHost() being called in >>>>>>ScannerCallable#prepare() >>>>>> [HBASE-8640] - ServerName in master may not initialize with the >>>>>>configured ipc address of hbase.master.ipc.address >>>>>> [HBASE-8655] - Backport to 94 - HBASE-8346(Prefetching .META. rows >>>>>>in case only when useCache is set to true) >>>>>> [HBASE-8656] - Rpc call may not be notified in SecureClient >>>>>> [HBASE-8671] - Per-region WAL breaks CP backwards compatibility in >>>>>>0.94 for non-enabled case >>>>>> [HBASE-8684] - Table Coprocessor can't access external HTable by >>>>>>default >>>>>> [HBASE-8700] - IntegrationTestBigLinkedList can fail due to random >>>>>>number collision >>>>>> [HBASE-8724] - [0.94] ExportSnapshot should not use hbase.tmp.dir as >>>>>>a staging dir on hdfs >>>>>> [HBASE-8742] - HTableDescriptor Properties not preserved when cloning >>>>>> [HBASE-8743] - upgrade hadoop-23 version to 0.23.7 >>>>>> [HBASE-8749] - Potential race condition between >>>>>>FSUtils.renameAndSetModifyTime() and HFile/LogCleaner >>>>>> [HBASE-8762] - Performance/operational penalty when calling >>>>>>HTable.get with a list of one Get >>>>>> [HBASE-8783] - RSSnapshotManager.ZKProcedureMemberRpcs may be >>>>>>initialized with the wrong server name >>>>>> [HBASE-5083] - Backup HMaster should have http infoport open with >>>>>>link to the active master >>>>>> [HBASE-8609] - Make the CopyTable support startRow, stopRow options >>>>>> [HBASE-8636] - Backport KeyValue Codec to 0.94 (HBASE-7413) >>>>>> [HBASE-8683] - Add major compaction support in CompactionTool >>>>>> [HBASE-8692] - [AccessController] Restrict HTableDescriptor >>>>>>enumeration >>>>>> [HBASE-8702] - Make WALEditCodec pluggable >>>>>> [HBASE-8504] - HTable.getRegionsInRange() should provide a >>>>>>non-cached API >>>>>> [HBASE-8603] - Backport HBASE-6921 to 0.94 >>>>>> >>>>>> The full list of changes is also available here: >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12324431 >>>>>> >>>>>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and >>>>>> vote +1/-1 by July 2nd on whether we should release this as 0.94.9. >>>>>> >>>>>> The release testing spreadsheet is available here: >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGFHaktDR0FqLWdtQWZwdncyVzE3Z2c#gid=0 >>>>>> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so >>>>>> that we can gauge the coverage) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Lars >>>>>> >>>>>> ps. I will likely be without access to the Internet for the next five >>>>>> days >>>
