On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > But if we instead allow that our versioning currently is of-kilter -- Lars > Hofhansl has argued off-line that 0.96.0 should have been 1.0 >
Related, is Hadoop 2.3.0 more like 3.0 ? If, for example, we wanted to pin the HFiles of IN_MEMORY tables in HDFS's centralized cache, as HDFS-4949 suggests, then how different will our view of the HDFS interfaces be between 2.0.0 and 2.3.0+? Would the (I'm guessing) necessary reflection be a perf issue? Maybe a new hadoop-compat module for 2.3.0 +? Or drop support for Hadoop < 2.3.0 ? Point is - after we finish this discussion about Hadoop 1 or not (seems not), then what to do about the different flavors of Hadoop 2. -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
