Sorry I have not looked at the data what u have pasted. Do u have more than one CF getting scanned? If so u might be facing the bug HBASE-10850
-Anoop- On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Nadya Privalova <[email protected]>wrote: > I tried 0.96 and 0.98 hadoop 1. Behaviour is the same. HBase configuration > is the most simple, from QuickStartGuide. > > Nadya > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Anoop John <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Which version you are using? > > > > -Anoop- > > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Nadya Privalova < > [email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Hello folks, > > > I saw a lot of questions about SingleColumnValueFilter but I have one > > more. > > > The question is about setFilterIfMissing value and it's behaviour with > > > other column families. > > > I have the following in my db: > > > hbase(main):004:0> scan 'c59d09d425244b9bb216a229c2441819_resource' > > > ROW > > > COLUMN+CELL > > > > > > resource-id > > column=f:project_id, > > > timestamp=1397138905401, > > > value="project-id" > > > > > > resource-id > column=f:s_test-1, > > > timestamp=1397138905401, > > > value="1" > > > > > > resource-id > > > column=m:9222030811254775807+test-1+instance!cumulative!, > > > timestamp=1397138905401, value={"$date": > > > 1341225600000} > > > resource-id > > > column=m:9222030811314775807+test-1+instance!cumulative!, > > > timestamp=1397138905377, value={"$date": > > > 1341225540000} > > > resource-id-2 > > column=f:project_id, > > > timestamp=1397138905422, > > > value="project-id-2" > > > > > > resource-id-2 column=f:s_test, > > > timestamp=1397138905422, > > > value="1" > > > > > > > > > resource-id-2 > > > column=m:9222030811134775807+test+instance!cumulative!, > > > timestamp=1397138905422, value={"$date": 1341225720000} > > > > > > After filter applying I see the following: > > > hbase(main):005:0> scan 'c59d09d425244b9bb216a229c2441819_resource', > > > {FILTER => "(SingleColumnValueFilter ('f', 's_test-1', =, > 'binary:\"1\"', > > > true, false))"} > > > ROW > > > COLUMN+CELL > > > > > > resource-id > > column=f:project_id, > > > timestamp=1397138905401, > > > value="project-id" > > > > > > resource-id > column=f:s_test-1, > > > timestamp=1397138905401, > > > value="1" > > > > > > > > > resource-id > > > column=m:9222030811254775807+test-1+instance!cumulative!, > > > timestamp=1397138905401, value={"$date": > > > 1341225600000} > > > resource-id > > > column=m:9222030811314775807+test-1+instance!cumulative!, > > > timestamp=1397138905377, value={"$date": > > > 1341225540000} > > > resource-id-2 > > > column=m:9222030811134775807+test+instance!cumulative!, > > > timestamp=1397138905422, value={"$date": 1341225720000} > > > > > > I wonder why I see resource-id-2 in output even with > > > setFilterIfMissing==True? Row with id 'resource-id-2' doesn't contain > > > "f:s_test-1", it contains only "f:s_test". From docs about > > > setFilterIfMissing: "If true, the entire row will be skipped if the > > column > > > is not found." > > > So column 's_test-1' is not found in resource-id-2. But I still see > this > > > row (but only 'm' CF) in output. > > > Of course I can determine COLUMNS=['f'] and resource-id-2 will not be > > > shown. But I can't because I need values from 'm'. > > > Could you please comment this behaviour? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Nadya > > > (From OpenStack Ceilometer team) > > > > > >
