Ted, now the issue is reproduced with 0.98.1-hadoop1. I will try 0.98.2
because the bug Anoop pointed contains "Fix Version/s: 0.99.0, 0.98.2,
0.96.3".
Will keep you posted.
Thanks for your help,
Nadya
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There're two column families: f and m
>
> Nadya:
> Can you try running tip of 0.98 to see if the issue is resolved ?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Apr 11, 2014, at 2:56 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sorry I have not looked at the data what u have pasted. Do u have more
> > than one CF getting scanned? If so u might be facing the bug HBASE-10850
> >
> > -Anoop-
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Nadya Privalova <
> nprival...@mirantis.com>wrote:
> >
> >> I tried 0.96 and 0.98 hadoop 1. Behaviour is the same. HBase
> configuration
> >> is the most simple, from QuickStartGuide.
> >>
> >> Nadya
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Which version you are using?
> >>>
> >>> -Anoop-
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Nadya Privalova <
> >> nprival...@mirantis.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello folks,
> >>>> I saw a lot of questions about SingleColumnValueFilter but I have one
> >>> more.
> >>>> The question is about setFilterIfMissing value and it's behaviour with
> >>>> other column families.
> >>>> I have the following in my db:
> >>>> hbase(main):004:0> scan 'c59d09d425244b9bb216a229c2441819_resource'
> >>>> ROW
> >>>> COLUMN+CELL
> >>>>
> >>>> resource-id
> >>> column=f:project_id,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905401,
> >>>> value="project-id"
> >>>>
> >>>> resource-id
> >> column=f:s_test-1,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905401,
> >>>> value="1"
> >>>>
> >>>> resource-id
> >>>> column=m:9222030811254775807+test-1+instance!cumulative!,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905401, value={"$date":
> >>>> 1341225600000}
> >>>> resource-id
> >>>> column=m:9222030811314775807+test-1+instance!cumulative!,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905377, value={"$date":
> >>>> 1341225540000}
> >>>> resource-id-2
> >>> column=f:project_id,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905422,
> >>>> value="project-id-2"
> >>>>
> >>>> resource-id-2 column=f:s_test,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905422,
> >>>> value="1"
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> resource-id-2
> >>>> column=m:9222030811134775807+test+instance!cumulative!,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905422, value={"$date": 1341225720000}
> >>>>
> >>>> After filter applying I see the following:
> >>>> hbase(main):005:0> scan 'c59d09d425244b9bb216a229c2441819_resource',
> >>>> {FILTER => "(SingleColumnValueFilter ('f', 's_test-1', =,
> >> 'binary:\"1\"',
> >>>> true, false))"}
> >>>> ROW
> >>>> COLUMN+CELL
> >>>>
> >>>> resource-id
> >>> column=f:project_id,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905401,
> >>>> value="project-id"
> >>>>
> >>>> resource-id
> >> column=f:s_test-1,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905401,
> >>>> value="1"
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> resource-id
> >>>> column=m:9222030811254775807+test-1+instance!cumulative!,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905401, value={"$date":
> >>>> 1341225600000}
> >>>> resource-id
> >>>> column=m:9222030811314775807+test-1+instance!cumulative!,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905377, value={"$date":
> >>>> 1341225540000}
> >>>> resource-id-2
> >>>> column=m:9222030811134775807+test+instance!cumulative!,
> >>>> timestamp=1397138905422, value={"$date": 1341225720000}
> >>>>
> >>>> I wonder why I see resource-id-2 in output even with
> >>>> setFilterIfMissing==True? Row with id 'resource-id-2' doesn't contain
> >>>> "f:s_test-1", it contains only "f:s_test". From docs about
> >>>> setFilterIfMissing: "If true, the entire row will be skipped if the
> >>> column
> >>>> is not found."
> >>>> So column 's_test-1' is not found in resource-id-2. But I still see
> >> this
> >>>> row (but only 'm' CF) in output.
> >>>> Of course I can determine COLUMNS=['f'] and resource-id-2 will not be
> >>>> shown. But I can't because I need values from 'm'.
> >>>> Could you please comment this behaviour?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Nadya
> >>>> (From OpenStack Ceilometer team)
> >>
>
