Andrew, you are already doing a good job! Simply continue your good job and all the amazing work you are doing for all of us.
JM Le 2014-05-12 20:08, "Andrew Purtell" <apurt...@apache.org> a écrit : > To be frank I am mortified at the basic mistake on voting, and the all > around dumb stuff I managed to pull off this time around. But I do feel bad > about dropping 0.98, was up all night etc, so I humbly reconsider if you'll > allow it, and I promise to do a better job. > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:01 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Getting folks test releases is like pulling teeths, or herding cats, or > > getting three kids to agree which song from Frozen is the best :) > > > > All jokes aside, this *is* a problem. With the goal of more frequent > > releases release verification needs to be a smooth process. > > I do not know how to fix it, but if we all could just remember to test a > > release (and a simple verification does not take much time) that'd help. > > > > I take some of the blame. And I'll weasel an excuse: HBaseCon. :) > > > > Please reconsider Andy. It's not always fun, but it's important service > to > > the community. > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org> > > Cc: "u...@hbase.apache.org" <u...@hbase.apache.org> > > Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 7:54 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is > > available > > > > > > Actually I do resign as RM for 0.98 effective immediately. > > > > I've not seen the community before disinterested in a release > sufficiently > > that not even simple package verification is time worth spending. > > > > > > > On May 12, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Too late I already put out the artifacts. I thought the release vote is > > lazy consensus. If you would like me to resign as RM for 0.98 I will. > > > > > >> On May 12, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hey Andrew, > > >> > > >> Sorry for the late email here, but -- I believe releases need at least > > >> three +1 votes from PMC members[1]. Perhaps people were a bit busy > last > > >> week due to HBaseCon and we should extend the voting on this release > > >> candidate for another week? > > >> > > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > >> > > >> -Todd > > >> > > >> > > >>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org > > > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> With one +1 and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote has passed. I have sent > the > > >>> artifacts onward for mirroring and will announce in ~24 hours. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org > > > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1 > > >>>> > > >>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs on Java 6u43, > > 7u45, > > >>>> and 8u0. > > >>>> > > >>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, and YCSB. > > >>>> > > >>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and > > >>>> 0.98.2 indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to > dev@titled > > >>>> "Comparing the performance of 0.98.2 RC0 and 0.98.0 using YCSB". > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Andrew Purtell < > apurt...@apache.org > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is available for > > download > > >>> at > > >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.2RC0/ and Maven artifacts > > are > > >>>>> also available in the temporary repository > > >>>>> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1020. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: > > >>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326505 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific > Time > > >>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on May 7 on whether or not we should release this > > as > > >>>>> 0.98.2. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> - Andy > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > >>>>> (via Tom White) > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Best regards, > > >>>> > > >>>> - Andy > > >>>> > > >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > >>>> (via Tom White) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Best regards, > > >>> > > >>> - Andy > > >>> > > >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > >>> (via Tom White) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Todd Lipcon > > >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >