Andrew,  you are already doing a good job! Simply continue your good job
and all the amazing work you are doing for all of us.

JM
Le 2014-05-12 20:08, "Andrew Purtell" <apurt...@apache.org> a écrit :

> To be frank I am mortified at the basic mistake on voting, and the all
> around dumb stuff I managed to pull off this time around. But I do feel bad
> about dropping 0.98, was up all night etc, so I humbly reconsider if you'll
> allow it, and I promise to do a better job.
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:01 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Getting folks test releases is like pulling teeths, or herding cats, or
> > getting three kids to agree which song from Frozen is the best :)
> >
> > All jokes aside, this *is* a problem. With the goal of more frequent
> > releases release verification needs to be a smooth process.
> > I do not know how to fix it, but if we all could just remember to test a
> > release (and a simple verification does not take much time) that'd help.
> >
> > I take some of the blame. And I'll weasel an excuse: HBaseCon. :)
> >
> > Please reconsider Andy. It's not always fun, but it's important service
> to
> > the community.
> >
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
> > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> > Cc: "u...@hbase.apache.org" <u...@hbase.apache.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 7:54 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is
> > available
> >
> >
> > Actually I do resign as RM for 0.98 effective immediately.
> >
> > I've not seen the community before disinterested in a release
> sufficiently
> > that not even simple package verification is time worth spending.
> >
> >
> > > On May 12, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Too late I already put out the artifacts. I thought the release vote is
> > lazy consensus. If you would like me to resign as RM for 0.98 I will.
> > >
> > >> On May 12, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hey Andrew,
> > >>
> > >> Sorry for the late email here, but -- I believe releases need at least
> > >> three +1 votes from PMC members[1]. Perhaps people were a bit busy
> last
> > >> week due to HBaseCon and we should extend the voting on this release
> > >> candidate for another week?
> > >>
> > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > >>
> > >> -Todd
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> With one +1 and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote has passed. I have sent
> the
> > >>> artifacts onward for mirroring and will announce in ~24 hours.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs on Java 6u43,
> > 7u45,
> > >>>> and 8u0.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, and YCSB.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and
> > >>>> 0.98.2 indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to
> dev@titled
> > >>>> "Comparing the performance of 0.98.2 RC0 and 0.98.0 using YCSB".
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurt...@apache.org
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is available for
> > download
> > >>> at
> > >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.2RC0/ and Maven artifacts
> > are
> > >>>>> also available in the temporary repository
> > >>>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1020.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326505
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> Time
> > >>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on May 7 on whether or not we should release this
> > as
> > >>>>> 0.98.2.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ​    - Andy​
> > >>>>> ​
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > >>>>> (via Tom White)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  - Andy
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > >>>> (via Tom White)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>>
> > >>>  - Andy
> > >>>
> > >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > >>> (via Tom White)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Todd Lipcon
> > >> Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Reply via email to