Andy, Should we look at committing the tool in HBASE-12808 and perhaps opening a separate issue around getting it into the release profile? 0.98 might be a good place to sort that out before the compatibility policy officially needs to be enforced in 1.0+.
-Dima On Monday, January 19, 2015, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Tests are looking better now. We are far enough delayed so I plan to kick > off the RC process on January 26 to get back to approximately end of month > releases. Please let me know if you have any concerns. > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > The 0.98 RC is on hold. There are some test instabilities that would > > prevent a successful release qualification. See HBASE-12843, HBASE-12846, > > and HBASE-12847. HBASE-12843 was resolved but I'm watching for > > reoccurrance. The others may be related (need to dig in more on 12846). > > They are all broadly master / assignment manager issues. > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > >> Short dev period due to the holidays, but let's keep the release cadence > >> more or less on track. Please let me know if you have any concerns. > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> > >> - Andy > >> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > >> (via Tom White) > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
