On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > My first reaction is that the convenience binaries better belong in > phoenix than > here. > > That would, potentially, be something good for them. However, the proposal > here is really about shipping a packaged version of HBase with the > additional capabilities offered by Phoenix. If this is about "us" and > "them", then the benefit here is for "us", not "them". Just want to clarify > if that wasn't clear in my original mail. > > I like the way you put it. I was just thinking it 'easier' for the phoenix project to do such a project since they are doing this work making a release anyways and also, I'd think that users who wanted such a packaging would expect to find it over in phoenix rather than here. I'd not object (not unless I were RM'ing). St.Ack
