Stack wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Andrew Purtell<apurt...@apache.org> wrote:
> So "we like semver", not "we use semver"?
>
>
and Sean's
> No longer claiming semver would also have the added benefit of making it for
me to easier to explain our compatibility promises to people.
Yeah, 'we like semvar'/'we are almost semvar' + and are actively working
toward 'semvar' would give us leeway that we seem to need as we learn what
semvar implies.
Does this 'admission' help with the which-hadoop thread too?
St.Ack
+1
