+1 as well.
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 4:36 PM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Stack wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Andrew Purtell<apurt...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> > So "we like semver", not "we use semver"? >>> > >>> > >> and Sean's >> >>> > No longer claiming semver would also have the added benefit of making it >>> > for >> me to easier to explain our compatibility promises to people. >> >> Yeah, 'we like semvar'/'we are almost semvar' + and are actively working >> toward 'semvar' would give us leeway that we seem to need as we learn what >> semvar implies. >> >> Does this 'admission' help with the which-hadoop thread too? >> >> St.Ack > > +1
