A perf evaluation for dev use is what I am thinking. Needed: A showing there are not perf regressions when MOB is included but not enabled. Very nice to have: A showing there are not perf regressions for value sizes not in the MOB sweet spot when MOB is enabled. Nice to have: A showing of perf improvement for value sizes in the MOB sweet spot when MOB is enabled. Happy to pitch in on all of these.
> On May 22, 2015, at 1:34 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > Just to make sure I have the concerns correct for 1.2: > > > MOB in 1.2 only if > * HBCK works correctly > * at rest encryption > * perf analysis > > Can we get some more detail on the output of the analysis? Are you thinking > something just for dev use, the ref guide, or a blog post? > >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Another point of clarification, sorry, I hit the send button too early it >> seems: I don't believe MOB is fully integrated yet, for example the feature >> is an extension to store that lacks support for encryption (this would >> technically be a feature regression); and HBCK. I have not been following >> MOB too closely so could be mistaken. These issues do not preclude a merge >> of MOB into trunk, but do preclude a merge back of MOB from trunk to >> branch-1. I would veto the latter until such shortcomings in the >> implementation that could be described as regressions are addressed. I >> would also like to see a performance analysis of a range of workloads >> before and after in as much detail as can be mustered, and would be happy >> to volunteer to help out with that. >> >> >> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> I was also thinking about RMing for 1.2 as we try and bring something >> post >>> 1.0 into production at my employer. >>> >>> Related, of the list of features proposed I would strongly prefer MOB not >>> be included. >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi folks! >>>> >>>> I'd like to volunteer to RM HBase 1.2 and aim for RCs starting in July. >>>> >>>> Here's an initial list of things I want to get out: >>>> >>>> * MOB >>>> >>>> * native crc >>>> >>>> * incremental improvements for procedure v2 >>>> >>>> * adding Java 8 as supported >>>> >>>> >>>> Anything else folks want to see called out? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sean >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> >>> - Andy >>> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>> (via Tom White) >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) > > > > -- > Sean
