> I would assert that to be because less and less things are applying now.
I'm sure that's true as well (smile) On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > later versions of 0.98 are more stable > > > I would assert that to be because less and less things are applying now. > > Every time we have tried a new patch version of 1.0 ( We haven't really > tried any 1.1 since we've been on 1.2) there were new issues. I have yet to > try a new patch version that didn't have the same issues I would associate > with a minor version. > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
