No, each 0.94.x/0.96.x/98.x was or is a minor release. :-) Sometimes the changes in those releases could all be considered "point" in scope or effect but not always. Further supporting this point of view, when we went from 0.94 to 0.96 it was a major increment, in effect, due to 'the singularity'.
Doing a new minor every month would be more like a return to past state of affairs, for better or worse, in my humble opinion. > On Feb 24, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Is it time to branch for 1.3 ? > > >> Sean did a great job getting 1.2 out. However it was a hard difficult >> process that I wouldn't wish on anyone. Is it time to branch for 1.3 and >> start the process of stabilizing again so that we can get a monthly cadence >> for minor releases going? > > > Monthly cadence for minors is upping the ante. We used to be about > monthly's for point releases. > > +1 for the mighty Mikhail as RM. Sean, please UPS him the special robe that > he has to wear while performing his RMness duties. > > St.Ack
