What are the "features" in current branch-1 that is not there in 1.2? If there is none, it is not worth branching yet.
Enis On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, each 0.94.x/0.96.x/98.x was or is a minor release. :-) Sometimes the > changes in those releases could all be considered "point" in scope or > effect but not always. Further supporting this point of view, when we went > from 0.94 to 0.96 it was a major increment, in effect, due to 'the > singularity'. > > Doing a new minor every month would be more like a return to past state of > affairs, for better or worse, in my humble opinion. > > > On Feb 24, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> Is it time to branch for 1.3 ? > > > > > >> Sean did a great job getting 1.2 out. However it was a hard difficult > >> process that I wouldn't wish on anyone. Is it time to branch for 1.3 and > >> start the process of stabilizing again so that we can get a monthly > cadence > >> for minor releases going? > > > > > > Monthly cadence for minors is upping the ante. We used to be about > > monthly's for point releases. > > > > +1 for the mighty Mikhail as RM. Sean, please UPS him the special robe > that > > he has to wear while performing his RMness duties. > > > > St.Ack >
