I am interested in hearing about user experience with MOB feature as well. In my opinion, this feature is a nice addition to branch-1.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > +user@ > > Is there anyone using the MOB feature in trunk for anything who can comment > on how well it's been working out? Intel folks maybe? > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > > > The last time MOB on branch-1 came up, folks were concerned that it > > wasn't stable enough in master yet. Is that still the case? > > > > Can we get a [DISCUSS] flagged thread to see what, if anything, folks > > would like to see gate inclusion in branch-1? > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > +1 to 1.2 being feature complete corrently. There has already been a > > > release candidate and folks are burning down the blockers currently to > > prep > > > for the next RC. > > > > > > I like the idea of mob and sparkonhbase for 1.3. I'm more comfortable > > with > > > sparkonhbase -- it is a new module and thus not as invasive. > > > > > > Jon. > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Pretty sure Sean expressed 1.2 is feature complete and I'd support > that. > > >> Can we wait for 1.3 for MOB ? Can look at Spark connector then too. > > >> > > >> > On Jan 19, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Looks like 1.2.0 RC is in near future. > > >> > > > >> > I wonder if it is time to revive this thread (due to customer > > interest). > > >> > > > >> > As far as I can tell, the Mob related tests have been passing in the > > >> recent > > >> > past. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks > > >> > > > >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Andrew Purtell < > apurt...@apache.org > > > > > >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> I haven't heard an user answer in the affirmative to wanting it. > > >> >> > > >> >> I'll volunteer to RM 1.3, whenever we need it. Premature to have > that > > >> >> discussion without 1.2 even out the door yet, though. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Stephen Jiang < > > syuanjiang...@gmail.com > > >> > > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> Actually, it is actively changing in master branch on MOB feature > > made > > >> me > > >> >>> think about: if we ever want to port MOB feature to branch-1, now > > is a > > >> >> good > > >> >>> time. We can commit changes in both branches; otherwise, we > > probably > > >> >> would > > >> >>> miss some commits when we port MOB to branch-1 in a late time. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> I am more thinking about 1.3 release (certainly not 1.2), which we > > >> still > > >> >>> have some time to stabilize and allow interesting party to play > with > > >> the > > >> >>> feature and give feedback. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Thanks > > >> >>> Stephen > > >> >>> > > >> >>> PS. given the features we discussed in 2.0.0 in the last community > > >> >> meeting, > > >> >>> I think it would not release earlier than 1.3 :-), unless we > > >> >> intentionally > > >> >>> not find a release manager for 1.3. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sean Busbey < > bus...@cloudera.com> > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> It's practically November. Matteo, are you up for a thread on > > target > > >> >>>> dates for 2.0.0 to start RCs? > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Elliott Clark < > ecl...@apache.org > > > > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>>>> I feel the same lets keep branch-1 stable, and work towards a > > faster > > >> >>>> 2.0.0. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> > wrote: > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> IMO, MOB is still not settled in Master. It has a bunch of > flakey > > >> >>> tests > > >> >>>>>> that are getting fixed by Jingcheng or I've disabled them till > > >> >> someone > > >> >>>> has > > >> >>>>>> time to look at them. There is also a load of duplicated code > > that > > >> >> is > > >> >>>> being > > >> >>>>>> cleaned up (Matteo). > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Its not ready to go back to branch-1 IMO. > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Are there users who'd like it backported? > > >> >>>>>> St.Ack > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stephen Jiang < > > >> >>>> syuanjiang...@gmail.com> > > >> >>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> Hello, guys, the MOB is in master branch. I saw bug fixes > > >> >> happening > > >> >>>> in > > >> >>>>>>> master branch. > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> I just wonder whether there is a plan to put MOB in > branch-1. I > > >> >> am > > >> >>>>>> afraid > > >> >>>>>>> if we don't do it now, it would be harder in the future to > back > > >> >> port > > >> >>>> if > > >> >>>>>> we > > >> >>>>>>> decide to do it in a late time. > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> Thanks > > >> >>>>>>> Stephen > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > >> >>> apurt...@apache.org> > > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Jon. > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> When I'm back in the office I'll check out master and have a > > >> >> look > > >> >>>> into > > >> >>>>>>> any > > >> >>>>>>>> locally repeatable test failures. Anyway in my opinion at > this > > >> >>>> point it > > >> >>>>>>>> would make the most sense for us to keep the MOB changes in > on > > >> >>>> master > > >> >>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>> deal with any fallout in follow on issues. I think all who > > voted > > >> >>> +1 > > >> >>>> for > > >> >>>>>>>> this change were aware that large changes like this can have > a > > >> >>>>>>> temporarily > > >> >>>>>>>> destabilizing effect. As long as the MOB devs are around to > > help > > >> >>>> clean > > >> >>>>>>> up, > > >> >>>>>>>> we should be good! > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jonathan Hsieh < > > >> >> j...@cloudera.com > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> I had two clean full builds/unit test on my internal setup > and > > >> >>> the > > >> >>>>>>> latest > > >> >>>>>>>>> build went back to ~4325 total tests and failures on > Procedure > > >> >>>> relate > > >> >>>>>>>> tests > > >> >>>>>>>>> cases. > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> I don't think mob is responsible for these failures. > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> Jon. > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Jonathan Hsieh < > > >> >>> j...@cloudera.com > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Although the the precommit buiid passed, and the > compilation > > >> >>> and > > >> >>>>>> mob > > >> >>>>>>>>>> testing I ran after before the merge was commited passed, > It > > >> >>>> looks > > >> >>>>>>> like > > >> >>>>>>>>>> the first full build after the merge [1] failed. It looked > > >> >>> like > > >> >>>>>>>>>> something hung along the way, and that most of the previous > > >> >>>> builds > > >> >>>>>>> had > > >> >>>>>>>>>> failed for various reasons. :( > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> I kicked it off again have it do another try. If it is mob > > >> >>>> related > > >> >>>>>>>> we'll > > >> >>>>>>>>>> take hunt it down and take care of it. > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Jon. > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/6672/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Hsieh < > > >> >>>> j...@cloudera.com> > > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I've merged the code in to master. Thanks for all the > hard > > >> >>>> work > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Jingcheng and thanks to all who have been involved with > > >> >>>> reviews, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> discussion, and voting! > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Jon > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Jingcheng Du < > > >> >>>>>>>> jingcheng...@intel.com> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote passes with 8 +1s and no -1. Thanks all for > > >> >>> guiding, > > >> >>>>>>> helping > > >> >>>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> voting! > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> We will work on the merge activities and will let guys > > >> >> know > > >> >>>> about > > >> >>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> detailed plan for merge time. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And thanks Jon for helping merge this branch to trunk! > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jingcheng > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context: > > >> >> > > >> > > > http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Merge-branch-hbase-11339-HBase-MOB-to-trunk-tp4073446.html > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the HBase Developer mailing list archive at > > >> >>>> Nabble.com. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > >> >>>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > >> >>>>>>>>>> // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > >> >>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > >> >>>>>>>>> // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>> Best regards, > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> - Andy > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. > - > > >> >>> Piet > > >> >>>>>> Hein > > >> >>>>>>>> (via Tom White) > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> -- > > >> >>>> Sean > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Best regards, > > >> >> > > >> >> - Andy > > >> >> > > >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > >> >> (via Tom White) > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
