right, they're separate features but when asked about "robust backup/restore" (which is what I care about for this feature getting merged) things were pawned off on snapshots.
Are they independent enough that we can get backup/restore tolerant to failures prior to merge to master? Prior to backport to branch-1? On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > I agree these are separate features FWIW > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Vladimir Rodionov <vladrodio...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Do we have JIRA issue(s) covering making snapshots robust in the face >> >> of monkeys? >> >> I would like to mention that "robust snapshots" and "table backup/restore" >> are totally separate features, but we have separate JIRA for fault >> tolerance (HBASE-14413). >> >> -Vlad >> >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Sean: >> > Please see HBASE-14413 for the last question. >> > >> > FYI >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> > >> > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Vladimir Rodionov >> > > <vladrodio...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > Not sure what do you mean, Andrew by "trying out the branch via the >> > IT", >> > > > but we do not recommend running this with monkey enabled. >> > > > It has not been tested in a such scenario yet and frankly speaking it >> > is >> > > > not supposed to work (snapshots will fail anyway and we depends on >> > > > snapshots) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Also won't have time to test out the branch this week, but if we're >> > > not going to handle failures do we have tools or guidance on >> > > recovering in the case of things falling over? >> > > >> > > Do we have JIRA issue(s) covering making snapshots robust in the face >> > > of monkeys? >> > > >> > > -- >> > > busbey >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) -- busbey
