Thanks Stack and Enis. I concur, it's hard to say for those not intimate with the new code.
In the absence of more information, intuition says master carries meta to avoid a whole class of problems. On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Enis Söztutar <e...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Stack for reviving this. > > How to move forward here? The Pv2 master is almost done. An ITBLL bakeoff > > of new Pv2 based assign vs a Master that exclusively hosts hbase:meta? > > > > > I think we have to evaluate whether the new pv2 master works with remote > meta > updates and the fact that those updates can fail partially or succeed > without the > client getting the reply, etc. Sorry it has been some time I've looked at > the design. > Actually what would be very good is to have a design overview / write up of > the pv2 > in its current / final form so that we can evaluate. Last time I've looked > there was no > detailed design doc at all. > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
