I was following the patches up to some extend, but I am not up to date on the recent stuff. Let me spend some time with the newest code.
I think we can extend the vote to give others some more time as well. Enis On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > I won't pretend to be involved enough in the 2.0 work to give an opinion > :) -- I did say earlier that I'm happy to land this in 2.0 or 3.0 (whatever > master decides to be at the time I merge). > > If the spirit of the voters is to include this in 3.0 and not 2.0, that's > fine by me. I'm also happy to not immediately merge after this vote > completes. > > > Andrew Purtell wrote: > >> Would it help to cut a branch for 2.0 before attempting to merge in a new >> major feature? >> >> >> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Reminder: I hope to close this in ~30hrs and there have been no votes so >>> far. >>> >>> >>> Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>> Folks, >>>> >>>> This is a vote to (rebase and) merge the branch HBASE-16961 into master. >>>> Per the book, this requires 3 binding +1's from other committers to >>>> merge. >>>> >>>> Relevant info for those who want to revisit any topics: >>>> >>>> DISCUSS on merge[1] >>>> Design Doc[2] >>>> Staged user manual[3] >>>> >>>> I'll plan to leave this open for at least 72hrs of the work days >>>> (Wednesday May 10th EOD) in case there are any vetos. I would prefer to >>>> abstain from voting on my own feature and plan to do so if the votes are >>>> otherwise lacking. >>>> >>>> - Josh >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a28c69bff315a791b9f7b94 >>>> 6636446a60bd2ddc8d5a9f5c11c2bf6f4@%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E >>>> >>>> [2] http://home.apache.org/~elserj/hbase/FileSystemQuotasforApac >>>> heHBase.pdf >>>> [3] https://people.apache.org/~elserj/hbase/quotas/book.html#spa >>>> ce-quotas >>>> >>>> >> >>
