On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> On 6/7/17 1:17 AM, Stack wrote: >>> >> >>> I just set the version on master branch to be 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT. >> >> >> I was just thinking about this one this morning: would master become 2.1.0 >> or 3.0.0? >> >> I'd guess that the intent is to put more emphasis on the "x" instead of the >> "y" and "z" (for a version string "x.y.z")? We all on board with that plan >> too, for better or for worse? :) > > yeah, this is the same bit we did when branch-1 was created off of > master last major release. We need a place to put the breaking stuff. > > Hopefully we can exercise a more planned out approach to how long > master waits for the next branch-x.
Thinking about this more, did we document the branching strategy anywhere? Like, this is what I expect is going to happen, but it occurs to me that I can't point at why: * branch-2 made off of master * alpha/beta releases tagged off of branch-2 * branch-2.0 made off of branch-2 * 2.0.0 GA release tagged off of branch-2.0 * Follow on minor releases branch-2.y off of branch-2
