Hi, +1, because:
Signatures: ok Unit tests: ok (8u112) RSGroups: worked for me through the shell -1, because: hbase(main):005:0> list_rsgroups GROUPS test default 2 row(s) in *1512730813.6580* seconds Trust me, it was faster than 47 years :) Other listings (e.g. list_namespace) displayed the elapsed time correctly. Best regards, Balazs On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Checked signatures: good > Ran test suite: pass > 1M row LTT: pass > > Cheers > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > The first HBase 1.4.0 release candidate (RC0) is available for download > at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.0RC0/ and Maven > > artifacts are available in the temporary repository > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1185/ > . > > > > The git tag corresponding to the candidate is '1.4.0RC0' (3d571827cb). > > > > A detailed source and binary compatibility report for this release is > > available for your review at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.0RC0/ > > hbase-1.3.1-1.4.0RC0_compatibility_report.html > > . All reported compatibility issues should comply with policy but please > > review them carefully. > > > > A list of the 652 issues resolved in this release can be found at > > https://s.apache.org/OErT . > > > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try > > to close it Monday December 18, 2017 if we have sufficient votes. > > > > Prior to making this announcement I made the following preflight checks > to > > 1.4.0RC0 (3d571827cb): > > > > - RAT check passes (7u80) > > - Unit test suite passes (8u131) > > - LTT load 1M rows with 100% verification and 20% updates (8u131) > > - PE randomWrite, randomRead, scanRange100 (8u131) > > - 100M rows ITBLL (8u131) > > > > Between now and when I want to close the vote I'll write up human > readable > > release notes for the release announcement as promised. I also have > agreed > > to run a scale ITBLL test, a performance comparison with 1.2 using YCSB, > a > > performance comparison with 1.2 using PE, and an analysis of code and > > allocation hot spot changes from 1.2, all of which I will publish when > > available and factor in to my vote. > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrew > > >
