Hope we still have time to get the procedure based replication peer modification(HBASE-19397) in before cutting branch-2.0... :(
2018-01-07 21:51 GMT+08:00 Stack <st...@duboce.net>: > On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:55 AM, Apekshit Sharma <a...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > bq. Don't you think we have enough branches already mighty Appy? > > Yeah we do...sigh. > > > > > > idk about that. But don't we need a *patch* branch branch-2.0 (just like > > branch-1.4) where we "make backwards-compatible bug fixes" and a *minor* > > branch branch-2 where we "add functionality in a backwards-compatible > > manner". > > Quotes are from http://hbase.apache.org/book. > html#hbase.versioning.post10. > > I stumbled on this issue when thinking about backporting > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17436 for 2.1. > > > > > Yes. Was trying to put this off as long as possible -- to avoid yet more > banches that we need to backport to -- but looks like its coming time. > St.Ack > > > > > -- Appy > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 4:11 PM, stack <saint....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > It is not you. There are a bunch of flies we need to fix. This latter > is > > > for sure flakey. Let me take a look. Thanks, JMS. > > > > > > S > > > > > > On Jan 6, 2018 5:57 PM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <jean-m...@spaggiari.org > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > I might not doing the right magic to get that run.... If someone is > able > > to > > > get all the tests pass, can you please share the command you run? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > JMS > > > > > > > > > [INFO] Results: > > > [INFO] > > > [ERROR] Failures: > > > [ERROR] TestFromClientSide.testCheckAndDeleteWithCompareOp:4982 > > > expected:<false> but was:<true> > > > [ERROR] > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment. > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure > > > .testMergeRegionsConcurrently(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assig > > > nment.TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure) > > > [ERROR] Run 1: > > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.setup:111-> > resetProcExecutorTestingKillFl > > > ag:138 > > > expected executor to be running > > > [ERROR] Run 2: > > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.tearDown:128-> > > > resetProcExecutorTestingKillFl > > > ag:138 > > > expected executor to be running > > > [INFO] > > > [ERROR] > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment. > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure > > > .testMergeTwoRegions(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment.Tes > > > tMergeTableRegionsProcedure) > > > [ERROR] Run 1: > > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.setup:111-> > resetProcExecutorTestingKillFl > > > ag:138 > > > expected executor to be running > > > [ERROR] Run 2: > > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.tearDown:128-> > > > resetProcExecutorTestingKillFl > > > ag:138 > > > expected executor to be running > > > [INFO] > > > [ERROR] > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment. > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure > > . > > > testRecoveryAndDoubleExecution(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.ass > > > ignment.TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure) > > > [ERROR] Run 1: > > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.setup:111-> > resetProcExecutorTestingKillFl > > > ag:138 > > > expected executor to be running > > > [ERROR] Run 2: > > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.tearDown:128-> > > > resetProcExecutorTestingKillFl > > > ag:138 > > > expected executor to be running > > > [INFO] > > > [ERROR] > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.assignment. > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure > > . > > > testRollbackAndDoubleExecution(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.ass > > > ignment.TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure) > > > [ERROR] Run 1: > > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.testRollbackAndDoubleExecution:272 > > > expected:<true> but was:<false> > > > [ERROR] Run 2: > > > TestMergeTableRegionsProcedure.tearDown:128-> > > > resetProcExecutorTestingKillFl > > > ag:138 > > > expected executor to be running > > > [INFO] > > > [ERROR] TestSnapshotQuotaObserverChore.testSnapshotSize:276 Waiting > > > timed > > > out after [30 000] msec > > > [ERROR] > > > TestHRegionWithInMemoryFlush>TestHRegion.testWritesWhileScanning:3813 > > > expected null, but was:<org.apache.hadoop.hbase. > > NotServingRegionException: > > > testWritesWhileScanning,,1515277468063.468265483817cb6da632026ba5b306 > f6. > > > is > > > closing> > > > [ERROR] Errors: > > > [ERROR] TestDLSAsyncFSWAL>AbstractTestDLS.testThreeRSAbort:401 » > > > TableNotFound testThr... > > > [ERROR] > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.TestRegionsOnMasterOptions. > > > testRegionsOnAllServers(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer. > > > TestRegionsOnMasterOptions) > > > [ERROR] Run 1: > > > TestRegionsOnMasterOptions.testRegionsOnAllServers:94-> > > > checkBalance:207->Object.wait:-2 > > > » TestTimedOut > > > [ERROR] Run 2: TestRegionsOnMasterOptions.testRegionsOnAllServers » > > > Appears to be stuck in t... > > > [INFO] > > > [INFO] > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 3604, Failures: 7, Errors: 2, Skipped: 44 > > > [INFO] > > > > > > > > > 2018-01-06 15:52 GMT-05:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > jean-m...@spaggiari.org > > >: > > > > > > > Deleted the class to get all the tests running. Was running on the > RC1 > > > > from the tar. > > > > > > > > I know get those one failing. > > > > > > > > [ERROR] Failures: > > > > [ERROR] TestFavoredStochasticLoadBalan > cer.test2FavoredNodesDead:352 > > > > Balancer did not run > > > > [ERROR] TestRegionMergeTransactionOnCl > uster.testCleanMergeReference: > > > 284 > > > > hdfs://localhost:45311/user/jmspaggi/test-data/7c269e83- > > > > 5982-449e-8cf8-6babaaaa4c7c/data/default/testCleanMergeReference/ > > > > f1bdc6441b090dbacb391c74eaf0d1d0 > > > > [ERROR] Errors: > > > > [ERROR] TestDLSAsyncFSWAL>AbstractTestDLS.testThreeRSAbort:401 » > > > > TableNotFound Region ... > > > > [INFO] > > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 3604, Failures: 2, Errors: 1, Skipped: 44 > > > > > > > > > > > > I have not been able to get all the tests passed locally for a while > :( > > > > > > > > JM > > > > > > > > 2018-01-06 15:05 GMT-05:00 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > >> Looks like you didn't include HBASE-19666 which would be in the next > > RC. > > > >> > > > >> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > >> jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Trying with a different command line (mvn test -P runAllTests > > > >> > -Dsurefire.secondPartThreadCount=12 > -Dtest.build.data.basedirector > > > >> y=/ram4g > > > >> > ) I get all those one failing. How are you able to get everything > > > >> passed??? > > > >> > > > > >> > [INFO] Results: > > > >> > [INFO] > > > >> > [ERROR] Failures: > > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio:74-> > > TestCom > > > >> > pactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > > compactEquals:201 > > > >> > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > > testStuckStoreCompaction:145->T > > > >> > estCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > > >> compactEquals:201 > > > >> > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > > > >> > [INFO] > > > >> > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4 > > > >> > > > > >> > Second run: > > > >> > [INFO] Results: > > > >> > [INFO] > > > >> > [ERROR] Failures: > > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio:74-> > > > >> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > > > >> .compactEquals:201 > > > >> > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > > testStuckStoreCompaction:145-> > > > >> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > > > >> .compactEquals:201 > > > >> > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > > > >> > [INFO] > > > >> > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4 > > > >> > > > > >> > Then again: > > > >> > > > > >> > [INFO] Results: > > > >> > [INFO] > > > >> > [ERROR] Failures: > > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio:74-> > > > >> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > > > >> .compactEquals:201 > > > >> > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > > >> > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > > testStuckStoreCompaction:145-> > > > >> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > > > >> .compactEquals:201 > > > >> > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > > > >> > [INFO] > > > >> > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4 > > > >> > [INFO] > > > >> > [INFO] ------------------------------ > ------------------------------ > > > >> > ------------ > > > >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Sound like it's always the exact same result. Do I have a way to > > > exclude > > > >> > this TestCompactionPolicy test from the run? > > > >> > > > > >> > Here are more details from the last failure: > > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >> > ------------------- > > > >> > Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > > TestDefaultCompactSelec > > > >> tion > > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >> > ------------------- > > > >> > Tests run: 4, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > > 1.323 > > > s > > > >> > <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > > >> > TestDefaultCompactSelection > > > >> > testStuckStoreCompaction(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserve > > > >> r.TestDefaultCompactSelection) > > > >> > Time elapsed: 1.047 s <<< FAILURE! > > > >> > org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but > > was:<[[99, > > > >> 30, > > > >> > ]30, 30, 30]> > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > > >> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.testStuckStoreCompaction( > > > >> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.java:145) > > > >> > > > > >> > testCompactionRatio(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.Tes > > > >> tDefaultCompactSelection) > > > >> > Time elapsed: 0.096 s <<< FAILURE! > > > >> > org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > > >> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio( > > > >> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.java:74) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,240 WARN [StoreOpener-22ce1d683ba4b6b93 > > > >> 73a3c541ebab2a2-1] > > > >> > util.CommonFSUtils(536): FileSystem doesn't support > > setStoragePolicy; > > > >> > HDFS-6584, HDFS-9345 not available. This is normal and expected on > > > >> earlier > > > >> > Hadoop versions. > > > >> > java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.apache.hadoop.fs. > > > LocalFileSystem. > > > >> > setStoragePolicy(org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path, java.lang.String) > > > >> > at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2130) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils. > > > >> > invokeSetStoragePolicy(CommonFSUtils.java:528) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils. > > > setStoragePolicy( > > > >> > CommonFSUtils.java:518) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > HRegionFileSystem. > > > >> > setStoragePolicy(HRegionFileSystem.java:193) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.<init>( > > > >> > HStore.java:250) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion. > > > >> > instantiateHStore(HRegion.java:5497) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$1.call( > > > >> > HRegion.java:1002) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$1.call( > > > >> > HRegion.java:999) > > > >> > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask. > java:266) > > > >> > at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter. > > > >> > call(Executors.java:511) > > > >> > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask. > java:266) > > > >> > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker( > > > >> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) > > > >> > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run( > > > >> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) > > > >> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,322 DEBUG [main] util.CommonFSUtils(538): > > > FileSystem > > > >> > doesn't support setStoragePolicy; HDFS-6584, HDFS-9345 not > > available. > > > >> This > > > >> > is normal and expected on earlier Hadoop versions. > > > >> > java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.apache.hadoop.fs. > > > LocalFileSystem. > > > >> > setStoragePolicy(org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path, java.lang.String) > > > >> > at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2130) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils. > > > >> > invokeSetStoragePolicy(CommonFSUtils.java:528) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils. > > > setStoragePolicy( > > > >> > CommonFSUtils.java:518) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > HRegionFileSystem. > > > >> > setStoragePolicy(HRegionFileSystem.java:193) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.<init>( > > > >> > HStore.java:250) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > TestCompactionPolicy. > > > >> > initialize(TestCompactionPolicy.java:109) > > > >> > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > > >> > TestCompactionPolicy.setUp(TestCompactionPolicy.java:69) > > > >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native > > > Method) > > > >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( > > > >> > NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > > > >> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( > > > >> > DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > > > >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1. > > > runReflectiveCall( > > > >> > FrameworkMethod.java:50) > > > >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. > model.ReflectiveCallable.run( > > > >> > ReflectiveCallable.java:12) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod. > > invokeExplosively( > > > >> > FrameworkMethod.java:47) > > > >> > at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. > > > >> > evaluate(RunBefores.java:24) > > > >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. > > statements.RunAfters.evaluate( > > > >> > RunAfters.java:27) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf( > > > ParentRunner.java:325 > > > >> ) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( > > > >> > BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( > > > >> > BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run( > > > ParentRunner.java:290) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule( > > > ParentRunner.java: > > > >> 71) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren( > > > >> > ParentRunner.java:288) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000( > > > ParentRunner.java: > > > >> 58) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate( > > > >> > ParentRunner.java:268) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner. > > java:363) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run( > > > ParentRunner.java:290) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule( > > > ParentRunner.java: > > > >> 71) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren( > > > >> > ParentRunner.java:288) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000( > > > ParentRunner.java: > > > >> 58) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate( > > > >> > ParentRunner.java:268) > > > >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner. > > java:363) > > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCore.run( > > > >> > JUnitCore.java:55) > > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > > >> > createRequestAndRun(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:137) > > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > > >> > executeEager(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:107) > > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > > >> > execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:83) > > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > > >> > execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:75) > > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreProvider. > > > >> > invoke(JUnitCoreProvider.java:159) > > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. > > > >> > invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:373) > > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. > > > >> > runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:334) > > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute( > > > >> > ForkedBooter.java:119) > > > >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main( > > > >> > ForkedBooter.java:407) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,398 INFO [main] hbase.ResourceChecker(172): > > > after: > > > >> > regionserver.TestDefaultCompactSelection#testStuckStoreCompaction > > > >> > Thread=11 (was 7) > > > >> > Potentially hanging thread: Monitor thread for TaskMonitor > > > >> > java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method) > > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.monitoring.TaskMonitor$ > > > >> > MonitorRunnable.run(TaskMonitor.java:302) > > > >> > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > > >> > > > > >> > Potentially hanging thread: org.apache.hadoop.fs. > > > FileSystem$Statistics$ > > > >> > StatisticsDataReferenceCleaner > > > >> > java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > > > >> > java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java: > > 143) > > > >> > java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java: > > 164) > > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Statistics$ > > > >> > StatisticsDataReferenceCleaner.run(FileSystem.java:3063) > > > >> > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > > >> > > > > >> > Potentially hanging thread: LruBlockCacheStatsExecutor > > > >> > sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) > > > >> > java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos( > > > >> > LockSupport.java:215) > > > >> > java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ > > > >> > ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078) > > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ > > > >> > DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093) > > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ > > > >> > DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809) > > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask( > > > >> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074) > > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker( > > > >> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134) > > > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run( > > > >> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) > > > >> > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > > >> > > > > >> > Potentially hanging thread: StoreOpener- > > > 22ce1d683ba4b6b9373a3c541ebab2 > > > >> > a2-1.LruBlockCache.EvictionThread > > > >> > java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.LruBlockCache$ > EvictionThre > > > >> ad.run( > > > >> > LruBlockCache.java:894) > > > >> > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > > >> > - Thread LEAK? -, OpenFileDescriptor=232 (was 232), > > > >> > MaxFileDescriptor=1048576 (was 1048576), SystemLoadAverage=204 > (was > > > >> 204), > > > >> > ProcessCount=273 (was 273), AvailableMemoryMB=4049 (was 4132) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Full log attached > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > > > > >> > JMS > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > 2018-01-06 9:34 GMT-05:00 Mike Drob <md...@apache.org>: > > > >> > > > > >> >> I can reproduce the issue locally. I think it has to do with the > > java > > > >> >> version being used - IIRC this is related to the version of java > > > used, > > > >> but > > > >> >> we can discuss in more detail on the JIRA. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19721 > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Thanks, JMS! > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 6:42 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > >> >> jean-m...@spaggiari.org > > > >> >> > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > How you guys are able to get the tests running? > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > For me it keeps failing on TestReversedScannerCallable. > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > I tried many times, always fails in the same place. I'm running > > on > > > a > > > >> 4GB > > > >> >> > tmpfs. Details are below. Am I doing something wrong? > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > JM > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > ./dev-support/hbasetests.sh runAllTests > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > [INFO] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestOperation > > > >> >> > [INFO] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Results: > > > >> >> > [INFO] > > > >> >> > [ERROR] Errors: > > > >> >> > [ERROR] TestReversedScannerCallable.unnecessary Mockito > > > stubbings > > > >> » > > > >> >> > UnnecessaryStubbing > > > >> >> > [INFO] > > > >> >> > [ERROR] Tests run: 245, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 8 > > > >> >> > [INFO] > > > >> >> > [INFO] > > > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >> >> ------------ > > > >> >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > > > >> >> > [INFO] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase ....................................... > > > SUCCESS > > > >> [ > > > >> >> > 1.409 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Checkstyle .......................... > > SUCCESS > > > [ > > > >> >> > 1.295 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Build Support ....................... > > SUCCESS > > > [ > > > >> >> > 0.038 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Error Prone Rules ................... > > SUCCESS > > > [ > > > >> >> > 1.069 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Annotations ......................... > > SUCCESS > > > [ > > > >> >> > 1.450 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Build Configuration ................. > > SUCCESS > > > [ > > > >> >> > 0.073 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Shaded Protocol ..................... > > SUCCESS > > > [ > > > >> >> > 14.292 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Common .............................. > > SUCCESS > > > >> >> [01:51 > > > >> >> > min] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Metrics API ......................... > > SUCCESS > > > [ > > > >> >> > 2.878 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Hadoop Compatibility ................ > > SUCCESS > > > [ > > > >> >> > 12.216 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Metrics Implementation .............. > > SUCCESS > > > [ > > > >> >> > 7.206 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Hadoop Two Compatibility ............ > > SUCCESS > > > [ > > > >> >> > 12.440 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Protocol ............................ > > SUCCESS > > > [ > > > >> >> > 0.074 s] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Client .............................. > > FAILURE > > > >> >> [02:10 > > > >> >> > min] > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Zookeeper ........................... > > SKIPPED > > > >> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Replication ......................... > > SKIPPED > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >> >> > ------------------- > > > >> >> > Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client. > > > TestReversedScannerCallable > > > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >> >> > ------------------- > > > >> >> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > > > >> 1.515 s > > > >> >> <<< > > > >> >> > FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client > > > >> >> .TestReversedScannerCallable > > > >> >> > unnecessary Mockito > > > >> >> > stubbings(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScanner > > > >> Callable) > > > >> >> > Time > > > >> >> > elapsed: 0.014 s <<< ERROR! > > > >> >> > org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnnecessaryStubbingException: > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Unnecessary stubbings detected in test class: > > > >> >> TestReversedScannerCallable > > > >> >> > Clean & maintainable test code requires zero unnecessary code. > > > >> >> > Following stubbings are unnecessary (click to navigate to > > relevant > > > >> line > > > >> >> of > > > >> >> > code): > > > >> >> > 1. -> at > > > >> >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable. > > setUp( > > > >> >> > TestReversedScannerCallable.java:66) > > > >> >> > 2. -> at > > > >> >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable. > > setUp( > > > >> >> > TestReversedScannerCallable.java:68) > > > >> >> > Please remove unnecessary stubbings. More info: javadoc for > > > >> >> > UnnecessaryStubbingException class. > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > 2018-01-06 0:44 GMT-05:00 stack <saint....@gmail.com>: > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > On Jan 5, 2018 4:44 PM, "Apekshit Sharma" <a...@cloudera.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > bq. Care needs to be exercised backporting. Bug fixes only > > > please. > > > >> If > > > >> >> in > > > >> >> > > doubt, ping me, the RM, please. Thanks. > > > >> >> > > In that case, shouldn't we branch out branch-2.0? We can then > > do > > > >> >> normal > > > >> >> > > backports to branch-2 and only bug fixes to branch-2.0. > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > Don't you think we have enough branches already mighty Appy? > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > No new features on branch-2? New features are in master/3.0.0 > > > only? > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > S > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Andrew Purtell < > > > >> apurt...@apache.org> > > > >> >> > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool is a flake, not a consistent > fail. > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> > > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > > >> >> apurt...@apache.org> > > > >> >> > > > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > This one is probably my fault: > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > TestDefaultCompactSelection > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > HBASE-19406 > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Balazs fixed it above, HBASE-19666 > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > It can easily be reverted. The failure of interest > > > >> >> > > > > > is TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.tes > > > >> tLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA > > > >> >> Bs. > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > This seems fine. Passes in nightly > > > >> >> > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase% > > > >> >> > > > > 20Nightly/job/branch-2/171/testReport/org.apache.hadoop. > > > >> >> > > > > hbase.regionserver/TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool/ > > > >> >> > > > > and locally against the tag. It fails consistently for > you > > > >> Andrew? > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Should all unit tests pass on a beta? I think so, at > > > least > > > >> if > > > >> >> the > > > >> >> > > > > > failures > > > >> >> > > > > > > are 100% repeatable. > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > This is fair. Let me squash this RC and roll another. > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Will put it up in a few hours. > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > Thanks, > > > >> >> > > > > S > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > -0 > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok > > > >> >> > > > > > > RAT check: ok > > > >> >> > > > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144) > > > >> >> > > > > > > Ran unit tests: some failures (8u144) > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.t > > > >> >> estCompactionRatio:74-> > > > >> >> > > > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEq > > > >> uals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > > >> >> > > > > > compactEquals:201 > > > >> >> > > > > > > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > > > >> >> > > testStuckStoreCompaction:145-> > > > >> >> > > > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEq > > > >> uals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > > > >> >> > > > > > compactEquals:201 > > > >> >> > > > > > > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, > > > 30]> > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > [ERROR] TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool. > > > >> >> > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleM > > > >> >> > > > > > SLABs:143 > > > >> >> > > > > > > All the chunks must have been cleared > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stack < > > > st...@duboce.net> > > > >> >> > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 > is > > up > > > >> at: > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ > > > >> dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0- > > > >> >> > > > beta-1-RC0/ > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> Maven artifacts are available from a staging > directory > > > >> here: > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/ > content/repositories/ > > > >> >> > > > > orgapachehbase-1188 > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1] > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC0 > > > >> >> > > > > > >> (0907563eb72697b394b8b960fe54887d6ff304fd) > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It > > > includes > > > >> all > > > >> >> > that > > > >> >> > > > was > > > >> >> > > > > > in > > > >> >> > > > > > >> previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap > > > >> read/write > > > >> >> > path, > > > >> >> > > > > > >> in-memory > > > >> >> > > > > > >> compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are > > sealed. > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview > of > > > >> >> > hbase-2.0.0. > > > >> >> > > > It > > > >> >> > > > > is > > > >> >> > > > > > >> meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and > > flag > > > us > > > >> >> if we > > > >> >> > > > > messed > > > >> >> > > > > > up > > > >> >> > > > > > >> on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are > > particular > > > >> >> > interested > > > >> >> > > > in > > > >> >> > > > > > >> hearing from Coprocessor developers. > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can > be > > > >> found > > > >> >> here > > > >> >> > > > [3]. > > > >> >> > > > > > >> There > > > >> >> > > > > > >> are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 > > > exclusively > > > >> >> can > > > >> >> > be > > > >> >> > > > > found > > > >> >> > > > > > >> here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive > me > > > if > > > >> >> > > mistakes). > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 > > > [6]. > > > >> >> We'll > > > >> >> > do > > > >> >> > > > one > > > >> >> > > > > > >> more > > > >> >> > > > > > >> beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release > > Candidate > > > by > > > >> >> the > > > >> >> > end > > > >> >> > > > of > > > >> >> > > > > > >> January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it > so > > > >> users > > > >> >> can > > > >> >> > do > > > >> >> > > a > > > >> >> > > > > > >> rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and > > any > > > >> bug > > > >> >> > fixes > > > >> >> > > > > found > > > >> >> > > > > > >> running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have > > > >> targeted so > > > >> >> > far > > > >> >> > > > for > > > >> >> > > > > > >> beta-2 [5]. Check it out. > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> One knownissue is that the User API has not been > > > properly > > > >> >> > filtered > > > >> >> > > > so > > > >> >> > > > > it > > > >> >> > > > > > >> shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public > content > > > >> >> > > (HBASE-19663, > > > >> >> > > > to > > > >> >> > > > > > be > > > >> >> > > > > > >> fixed by beta-2). > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on > > whether > > > >> it > > > >> >> ok > > > >> >> > to > > > >> >> > > > put > > > >> >> > > > > > out > > > >> >> > > > > > >> this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet > > been > > > >> >> > updated). > > > >> >> > > > Let > > > >> >> > > > > > the > > > >> >> > > > > > >> VOTE be open for 72 hours (Monday) > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> >> > > > > > >> Your 2.0.0 Release Manager > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search= > > > >> >> > 0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 > > > >> >> > > > > > >> 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr > > > >> >> > > > > > >> 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b > > > >> >> > > > > > >> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira > > > >> /projects/HBASE/versions/ > > > >> >> > > 12340862 > > > >> >> > > > > > >> 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > > > >> >> > > 1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ > > > >> >> > > > > > >> ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ > > > >> >> > > > > > >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > > > >> >> > 1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ > > > >> >> > > > > > ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > -- > > > >> >> > > > > > > Best regards, > > > >> >> > > > > > > Andrew > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning > > torn > > > >> from > > > >> >> > > > truth's > > > >> >> > > > > > > decrepit hands > > > >> >> > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > -- > > > >> >> > > > > > Best regards, > > > >> >> > > > > > Andrew > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning > torn > > > >> from > > > >> >> > > truth's > > > >> >> > > > > > decrepit hands > > > >> >> > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > -- > > > >> >> > > > Best regards, > > > >> >> > > > Andrew > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn > > from > > > >> >> truth's > > > >> >> > > > decrepit hands > > > >> >> > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > -- > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > -- Appy > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- Appy > > >
