Deleted the class to get all the tests running. Was running on the RC1 from the tar.
I know get those one failing. [ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] TestFavoredStochasticLoadBalancer.test2FavoredNodesDead:352 Balancer did not run [ERROR] TestRegionMergeTransactionOnCluster.testCleanMergeReference:284 hdfs://localhost:45311/user/jmspaggi/test-data/7c269e83-5982-449e-8cf8-6babaaaa4c7c/data/default/testCleanMergeReference/f1bdc6441b090dbacb391c74eaf0d1d0 [ERROR] Errors: [ERROR] TestDLSAsyncFSWAL>AbstractTestDLS.testThreeRSAbort:401 » TableNotFound Region ... [INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 3604, Failures: 2, Errors: 1, Skipped: 44 I have not been able to get all the tests passed locally for a while :( JM 2018-01-06 15:05 GMT-05:00 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>: > Looks like you didn't include HBASE-19666 which would be in the next RC. > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > > > Trying with a different command line (mvn test -P runAllTests > > -Dsurefire.secondPartThreadCount=12 -Dtest.build.data.basedirector > y=/ram4g > > ) I get all those one failing. How are you able to get everything > passed??? > > > > [INFO] Results: > > [INFO] > > [ERROR] Failures: > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio:74->TestCom > > pactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:201 > > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testStuckStoreCompaction:145->T > > estCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > compactEquals:201 > > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > > [INFO] > > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4 > > > > Second run: > > [INFO] Results: > > [INFO] > > [ERROR] Failures: > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio:74-> > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > .compactEquals:201 > > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testStuckStoreCompaction:145-> > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > .compactEquals:201 > > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > > [INFO] > > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4 > > > > Then again: > > > > [INFO] Results: > > [INFO] > > [ERROR] Failures: > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio:74-> > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > .compactEquals:201 > > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.testStuckStoreCompaction:145-> > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy > .compactEquals:201 > > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > > [INFO] > > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4 > > [INFO] > > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------ > > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > > > > > > Sound like it's always the exact same result. Do I have a way to exclude > > this TestCompactionPolicy test from the run? > > > > Here are more details from the last failure: > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------- > > Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestDefaultCompactSelec > tion > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------- > > Tests run: 4, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.323 s > > <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > TestDefaultCompactSelection > > testStuckStoreCompaction(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserve > r.TestDefaultCompactSelection) > > Time elapsed: 1.047 s <<< FAILURE! > > org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, > > ]30, 30, 30]> > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > TestDefaultCompactSelection.testStuckStoreCompaction( > > TestDefaultCompactSelection.java:145) > > > > testCompactionRatio(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.Tes > tDefaultCompactSelection) > > Time elapsed: 0.096 s <<< FAILURE! > > org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio( > > TestDefaultCompactSelection.java:74) > > > > > > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,240 WARN [StoreOpener-22ce1d683ba4b6b93 > 73a3c541ebab2a2-1] > > util.CommonFSUtils(536): FileSystem doesn't support setStoragePolicy; > > HDFS-6584, HDFS-9345 not available. This is normal and expected on > earlier > > Hadoop versions. > > java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalFileSystem. > > setStoragePolicy(org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path, java.lang.String) > > at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2130) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils. > > invokeSetStoragePolicy(CommonFSUtils.java:528) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils.setStoragePolicy( > > CommonFSUtils.java:518) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegionFileSystem. > > setStoragePolicy(HRegionFileSystem.java:193) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.<init>( > > HStore.java:250) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion. > > instantiateHStore(HRegion.java:5497) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$1.call( > > HRegion.java:1002) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$1.call( > > HRegion.java:999) > > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) > > at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter. > > call(Executors.java:511) > > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) > > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker( > > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) > > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run( > > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > > > > > > > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,322 DEBUG [main] util.CommonFSUtils(538): FileSystem > > doesn't support setStoragePolicy; HDFS-6584, HDFS-9345 not available. > This > > is normal and expected on earlier Hadoop versions. > > java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalFileSystem. > > setStoragePolicy(org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path, java.lang.String) > > at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2130) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils. > > invokeSetStoragePolicy(CommonFSUtils.java:528) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils.setStoragePolicy( > > CommonFSUtils.java:518) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegionFileSystem. > > setStoragePolicy(HRegionFileSystem.java:193) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.<init>( > > HStore.java:250) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestCompactionPolicy. > > initialize(TestCompactionPolicy.java:109) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver. > > TestCompactionPolicy.setUp(TestCompactionPolicy.java:69) > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( > > NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( > > DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) > > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall( > > FrameworkMethod.java:50) > > at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run( > > ReflectiveCallable.java:12) > > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively( > > FrameworkMethod.java:47) > > at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. > > evaluate(RunBefores.java:24) > > at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate( > > RunAfters.java:27) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325) > > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( > > BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78) > > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( > > BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java: > 71) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren( > > ParentRunner.java:288) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java: > 58) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate( > > ParentRunner.java:268) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363) > > at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128) > > at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java: > 71) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren( > > ParentRunner.java:288) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java: > 58) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate( > > ParentRunner.java:268) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363) > > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCore.run( > > JUnitCore.java:55) > > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > createRequestAndRun(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:137) > > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > executeEager(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:107) > > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:83) > > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper. > > execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:75) > > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreProvider. > > invoke(JUnitCoreProvider.java:159) > > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. > > invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:373) > > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. > > runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:334) > > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute( > > ForkedBooter.java:119) > > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main( > > ForkedBooter.java:407) > > > > > > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,398 INFO [main] hbase.ResourceChecker(172): after: > > regionserver.TestDefaultCompactSelection#testStuckStoreCompaction > > Thread=11 (was 7) > > Potentially hanging thread: Monitor thread for TaskMonitor > > java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method) > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.monitoring.TaskMonitor$ > > MonitorRunnable.run(TaskMonitor.java:302) > > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > > > Potentially hanging thread: org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Statistics$ > > StatisticsDataReferenceCleaner > > java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > > java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:143) > > java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:164) > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Statistics$ > > StatisticsDataReferenceCleaner.run(FileSystem.java:3063) > > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > > > Potentially hanging thread: LruBlockCacheStatsExecutor > > sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) > > java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos( > > LockSupport.java:215) > > java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ > > ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078) > > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ > > DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093) > > java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ > > DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809) > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask( > > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074) > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker( > > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134) > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run( > > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) > > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > > > Potentially hanging thread: StoreOpener-22ce1d683ba4b6b9373a3c541ebab2 > > a2-1.LruBlockCache.EvictionThread > > java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.LruBlockCache$EvictionThre > ad.run( > > LruBlockCache.java:894) > > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > - Thread LEAK? -, OpenFileDescriptor=232 (was 232), > > MaxFileDescriptor=1048576 (was 1048576), SystemLoadAverage=204 (was 204), > > ProcessCount=273 (was 273), AvailableMemoryMB=4049 (was 4132) > > > > > > Full log attached > > > > Thanks, > > > > JMS > > > > > > 2018-01-06 9:34 GMT-05:00 Mike Drob <md...@apache.org>: > > > >> I can reproduce the issue locally. I think it has to do with the java > >> version being used - IIRC this is related to the version of java used, > but > >> we can discuss in more detail on the JIRA. > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19721 > >> > >> Thanks, JMS! > >> > >> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 6:42 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > >> jean-m...@spaggiari.org > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > How you guys are able to get the tests running? > >> > > >> > For me it keeps failing on TestReversedScannerCallable. > >> > > >> > I tried many times, always fails in the same place. I'm running on a > 4GB > >> > tmpfs. Details are below. Am I doing something wrong? > >> > > >> > JM > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ./dev-support/hbasetests.sh runAllTests > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > [INFO] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestOperation > >> > [INFO] > >> > [INFO] Results: > >> > [INFO] > >> > [ERROR] Errors: > >> > [ERROR] TestReversedScannerCallable.unnecessary Mockito stubbings » > >> > UnnecessaryStubbing > >> > [INFO] > >> > [ERROR] Tests run: 245, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 8 > >> > [INFO] > >> > [INFO] > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > >> ------------ > >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > >> > [INFO] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase ....................................... SUCCESS [ > >> > 1.409 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Checkstyle .......................... SUCCESS [ > >> > 1.295 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Build Support ....................... SUCCESS [ > >> > 0.038 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Error Prone Rules ................... SUCCESS [ > >> > 1.069 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Annotations ......................... SUCCESS [ > >> > 1.450 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Build Configuration ................. SUCCESS [ > >> > 0.073 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Shaded Protocol ..................... SUCCESS [ > >> > 14.292 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Common .............................. SUCCESS > >> [01:51 > >> > min] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Metrics API ......................... SUCCESS [ > >> > 2.878 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Hadoop Compatibility ................ SUCCESS [ > >> > 12.216 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Metrics Implementation .............. SUCCESS [ > >> > 7.206 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Hadoop Two Compatibility ............ SUCCESS [ > >> > 12.440 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Protocol ............................ SUCCESS [ > >> > 0.074 s] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Client .............................. FAILURE > >> [02:10 > >> > min] > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Zookeeper ........................... SKIPPED > >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Replication ......................... SKIPPED > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > ------------------- > >> > Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > ------------------- > >> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.515 > s > >> <<< > >> > FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client > >> .TestReversedScannerCallable > >> > unnecessary Mockito > >> > stubbings(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable) > >> > Time > >> > elapsed: 0.014 s <<< ERROR! > >> > org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnnecessaryStubbingException: > >> > > >> > Unnecessary stubbings detected in test class: > >> TestReversedScannerCallable > >> > Clean & maintainable test code requires zero unnecessary code. > >> > Following stubbings are unnecessary (click to navigate to relevant > line > >> of > >> > code): > >> > 1. -> at > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable.setUp( > >> > TestReversedScannerCallable.java:66) > >> > 2. -> at > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable.setUp( > >> > TestReversedScannerCallable.java:68) > >> > Please remove unnecessary stubbings. More info: javadoc for > >> > UnnecessaryStubbingException class. > >> > > >> > > >> > 2018-01-06 0:44 GMT-05:00 stack <saint....@gmail.com>: > >> > > >> > > On Jan 5, 2018 4:44 PM, "Apekshit Sharma" <a...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > bq. Care needs to be exercised backporting. Bug fixes only please. > If > >> in > >> > > doubt, ping me, the RM, please. Thanks. > >> > > In that case, shouldn't we branch out branch-2.0? We can then do > >> normal > >> > > backports to branch-2 and only bug fixes to branch-2.0. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Don't you think we have enough branches already mighty Appy? > >> > > > >> > > No new features on branch-2? New features are in master/3.0.0 only? > >> > > > >> > > S > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool is a flake, not a consistent fail. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Purtell < > >> apurt...@apache.org> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > This one is probably my fault: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > TestDefaultCompactSelection > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > HBASE-19406 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Balazs fixed it above, HBASE-19666 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > It can easily be reverted. The failure of interest > >> > > > > > is TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.tes > tLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA > >> Bs. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > This seems fine. Passes in nightly > >> > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase% > >> > > > > 20Nightly/job/branch-2/171/testReport/org.apache.hadoop. > >> > > > > hbase.regionserver/TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool/ > >> > > > > and locally against the tag. It fails consistently for you > Andrew? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Should all unit tests pass on a beta? I think so, at least > if > >> the > >> > > > > > failures > >> > > > > > > are 100% repeatable. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > This is fair. Let me squash this RC and roll another. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Will put it up in a few hours. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > S > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > -0 > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok > >> > > > > > > RAT check: ok > >> > > > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144) > >> > > > > > > Ran unit tests: some failures (8u144) > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection.t > >> estCompactionRatio:74-> > >> > > > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEq > uals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > >> > > > > > compactEquals:201 > >> > > > > > > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [ERROR] TestDefaultCompactSelection. > >> > > testStuckStoreCompaction:145-> > >> > > > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEq > uals:182->TestCompactionPolicy. > >> > > > > > compactEquals:201 > >> > > > > > > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [ERROR] TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool. > >> > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleM > >> > > > > > SLABs:143 > >> > > > > > > All the chunks must have been cleared > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up > at: > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0- > >> > > > beta-1-RC0/ > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory > here: > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >> > > > > orgapachehbase-1188 > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1] > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC0 > >> > > > > > >> (0907563eb72697b394b8b960fe54887d6ff304fd) > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes > all > >> > that > >> > > > was > >> > > > > > in > >> > > > > > >> previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write > >> > path, > >> > > > > > >> in-memory > >> > > > > > >> compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed. > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of > >> > hbase-2.0.0. > >> > > > It > >> > > > > is > >> > > > > > >> meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us > >> if we > >> > > > > messed > >> > > > > > up > >> > > > > > >> on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular > >> > interested > >> > > > in > >> > > > > > >> hearing from Coprocessor developers. > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found > >> here > >> > > > [3]. > >> > > > > > >> There > >> > > > > > >> are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively > >> can > >> > be > >> > > > > found > >> > > > > > >> here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if > >> > > mistakes). > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. > >> We'll > >> > do > >> > > > one > >> > > > > > >> more > >> > > > > > >> beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by > >> the > >> > end > >> > > > of > >> > > > > > >> January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users > >> can > >> > do > >> > > a > >> > > > > > >> rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug > >> > fixes > >> > > > > found > >> > > > > > >> running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted > so > >> > far > >> > > > for > >> > > > > > >> beta-2 [5]. Check it out. > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> One knownissue is that the User API has not been properly > >> > filtered > >> > > > so > >> > > > > it > >> > > > > > >> shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content > >> > > (HBASE-19663, > >> > > > to > >> > > > > > be > >> > > > > > >> fixed by beta-2). > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it > >> ok > >> > to > >> > > > put > >> > > > > > out > >> > > > > > >> this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been > >> > updated). > >> > > > Let > >> > > > > > the > >> > > > > > >> VOTE be open for 72 hours (Monday) > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Thanks, > >> > > > > > >> Your 2.0.0 Release Manager > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search= > >> > 0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 > >> > > > > > >> 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr > >> > > > > > >> 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b > >> > > > > > >> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/ > >> > > 12340862 > >> > > > > > >> 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > >> > > 1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ > >> > > > > > >> ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ > >> > > > > > >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > >> > 1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ > >> > > > > > ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > Best regards, > >> > > > > > > Andrew > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn > from > >> > > > truth's > >> > > > > > > decrepit hands > >> > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > Best regards, > >> > > > > > Andrew > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > >> > > truth's > >> > > > > > decrepit hands > >> > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Best regards, > >> > > > Andrew > >> > > > > >> > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > >> truth's > >> > > > decrepit hands > >> > > > - A23, Crosstalk > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > > >> > > -- Appy > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
