Agreed, sorry for calling this out on a RC vote.

However, I did execute install before site.

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I think install is mandatory before site.
>
> > On Jan 30, 2018, at 1:11 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > You should follow the build instructions on our online manual (look for
> the #maven.release anchor). Please file a JIRA and maybe someone suitably
> motivated will look at it but I dont see this as a veto-able concern unless
> the build fails following our release procedures. That didn't happen. Or
> we'd not have a release candidate. :-)
> >
> >
> >> On Jan 30, 2018, at 1:00 PM, Zach York <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> -0 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> It still looks like mvn clean site fails (Also fails for 1.4.0, hence
> not a
> >> -1):
> >>
> >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> >> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.4:site (default-site) on
> >> project hbase: Error generating maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:aggregate:
> >> [ERROR] Exit code: 1 - warning: unknown enum constant When.MAYBE
> >> [ERROR] reason: class file for javax.annotation.meta.When not found
> >> [ERROR] warning: unknown enum constant When.ALWAYS
> >> [ERROR] warning: unknown enum constant When.UNKNOWN
> >> [ERROR] javadoc: error -
> >> com.sun.tools.doclets.internal.toolkit.util.DocletAbortException:
> >> com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol$CompletionFailure: class file for
> >> javax.annotation.concurrent.Immutable not found
> >>
> >> There was some initial investigation/discussion in
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19663 and
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19780 but that was for
> branch-2.
> >> Probably not a blocker for the release, but I still wanted to call this
> out.
> >>
> >> Zach
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Yu Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Checked sums and signatures: ok
> >>> Built from source: ok (7u79)
> >>> RAT check: ok (7u79)
> >>> Compatibility check: ok (7u79)
> >>> Unit tests pass: ok (7u79)
> >>> Shell commands: ok (8u101), ran DDL/flush/compact/split commands,
> >>> everything looks good
> >>> Loaded 1M rows with LTT: ok (8u101), all keys verified, latency and
> logs
> >>> looks good
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>> Yu
> >>>
> >>>> On 30 January 2018 at 02:28, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks Peter, much appreciated.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Peter Somogyi <[email protected]
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> The tests failed in localhost mode when executed from maven. I've
> just
> >>>>> checked some integration tests now on 1.4.0 and it fails there as
> well,
> >>>> so
> >>>>> it not a regression. I'm OK with a +1 on this RC.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Peter
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> >>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Are the integration test failures from when it runs in localhost
> >>> mode?
> >>>> I
> >>>>>> think these are long term test issues present since 1.3. Or, is this
> >>>> new
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>> 1.4.1? If these also have the same result with 1.4.0, indicating no
> >>> new
> >>>>>> regression, would you consider changing your vote?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Jan 29, 2018, at 6:54 AM, Peter Somogyi <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - RAT check: OK
> >>>>>>> - Signatures, checksums: OK
> >>>>>>> - Build from src: OK
> >>>>>>> - Start standalone from src and bin, run shell commands: OK
> >>>>>>> - LTT 1M rows: OK
> >>>>>>> - Web UI, logs: OK
> >>>>>>> - Ran full test suite: passes except integration tests
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I had failures in IntegrationTestRpcClient, IntegrationTestMTTR,
> >>>>>>> IntegrationTestBigLinkedListWithVisibility and
> >>>>>>> IntegrationTestWithCellVisibilityLoadAndVerify. All other tests
> >>>> passed
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>> me.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 3:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> >>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The first HBase 1.4.1 release candidate (RC0) is available for
> >>>>> download
> >>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.1RC0/ and
> >>>>> Maven
> >>>>>>>> artifacts are available in the temporary repository
> >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>>>> orgapachehbase-1194
> >>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The git tag corresponding to the candidate is '1.4.1RC0'
> >>>> (4b25debc83).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A detailed source and binary compatibility report for this release
> >>>> is
> >>>>>>>> available for your review at
> >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.1RC0/
> >>>>>>>> compat-check-report.html
> >>>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A list of the 38 issues resolved in this release can be found at
> >>>>>>>> https://s.apache.org/tx1w .
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I
> >>>> will
> >>>>>> try
> >>>>>>>> to close it Friday February 2, 2018 if we have sufficient votes.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Prior to making this announcement I made the following preflight
> >>>>> checks:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - RAT check passes (7u80)
> >>>>>>>> - Unit test suite passes 10 of 10 iterations (8u131)
> >>>>>>>> - LTT load 1M rows with 100% verification and 20% updates
> >>> (8u131)
> >>>>>>>> - PE sequentialWrite, sequentialRead, randomWrite, randomRead,
> >>>>>>>> scanRange100 (8u131)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>> Andrew
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> >>>> truth's
> >>>>>>>> decrepit hands
> >>>>>>>> - A23, Crosstalk
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Andrew
> >>>>
> >>>> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> >>>> decrepit hands
> >>>>  - A23, Crosstalk
> >>>>
> >>>
>

Reply via email to