Ok, then it is certainly JIRA worthy.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Zach York <zyork.contribut...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed, sorry for calling this out on a RC vote. > > However, I did execute install before site. > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I think install is mandatory before site. > > > > > On Jan 30, 2018, at 1:11 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > You should follow the build instructions on our online manual (look for > > the #maven.release anchor). Please file a JIRA and maybe someone suitably > > motivated will look at it but I dont see this as a veto-able concern > unless > > the build fails following our release procedures. That didn't happen. Or > > we'd not have a release candidate. :-) > > > > > > > > >> On Jan 30, 2018, at 1:00 PM, Zach York <zyork.contribut...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> -0 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> It still looks like mvn clean site fails (Also fails for 1.4.0, hence > > not a > > >> -1): > > >> > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > > >> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.4:site (default-site) on > > >> project hbase: Error generating maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3: > aggregate: > > >> [ERROR] Exit code: 1 - warning: unknown enum constant When.MAYBE > > >> [ERROR] reason: class file for javax.annotation.meta.When not found > > >> [ERROR] warning: unknown enum constant When.ALWAYS > > >> [ERROR] warning: unknown enum constant When.UNKNOWN > > >> [ERROR] javadoc: error - > > >> com.sun.tools.doclets.internal.toolkit.util.DocletAbortException: > > >> com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol$CompletionFailure: class file for > > >> javax.annotation.concurrent.Immutable not found > > >> > > >> There was some initial investigation/discussion in > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19663 and > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19780 but that was for > > branch-2. > > >> Probably not a blocker for the release, but I still wanted to call > this > > out. > > >> > > >> Zach > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> Checked sums and signatures: ok > > >>> Built from source: ok (7u79) > > >>> RAT check: ok (7u79) > > >>> Compatibility check: ok (7u79) > > >>> Unit tests pass: ok (7u79) > > >>> Shell commands: ok (8u101), ran DDL/flush/compact/split commands, > > >>> everything looks good > > >>> Loaded 1M rows with LTT: ok (8u101), all keys verified, latency and > > logs > > >>> looks good > > >>> > > >>> Best Regards, > > >>> Yu > > >>> > > >>>> On 30 January 2018 at 02:28, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks Peter, much appreciated. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Peter Somogyi < > psomo...@cloudera.com > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> The tests failed in localhost mode when executed from maven. I've > > just > > >>>>> checked some integration tests now on 1.4.0 and it fails there as > > well, > > >>>> so > > >>>>> it not a regression. I'm OK with a +1 on this RC. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Peter > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > >>>> andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Are the integration test failures from when it runs in localhost > > >>> mode? > > >>>> I > > >>>>>> think these are long term test issues present since 1.3. Or, is > this > > >>>> new > > >>>>> in > > >>>>>> 1.4.1? If these also have the same result with 1.4.0, indicating > no > > >>> new > > >>>>>> regression, would you consider changing your vote? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Jan 29, 2018, at 6:54 AM, Peter Somogyi < > psomo...@cloudera.com> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 0 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> - RAT check: OK > > >>>>>>> - Signatures, checksums: OK > > >>>>>>> - Build from src: OK > > >>>>>>> - Start standalone from src and bin, run shell commands: OK > > >>>>>>> - LTT 1M rows: OK > > >>>>>>> - Web UI, logs: OK > > >>>>>>> - Ran full test suite: passes except integration tests > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I had failures in IntegrationTestRpcClient, IntegrationTestMTTR, > > >>>>>>> IntegrationTestBigLinkedListWithVisibility and > > >>>>>>> IntegrationTestWithCellVisibilityLoadAndVerify. All other tests > > >>>> passed > > >>>>>> for > > >>>>>>> me. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 3:45 AM, Andrew Purtell < > > >>>> apurt...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> The first HBase 1.4.1 release candidate (RC0) is available for > > >>>>> download > > >>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.1RC0/ > and > > >>>>> Maven > > >>>>>>>> artifacts are available in the temporary repository > > >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >>>>> orgapachehbase-1194 > > >>>>>> . > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> The git tag corresponding to the candidate is '1.4.1RC0' > > >>>> (4b25debc83). > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> A detailed source and binary compatibility report for this > release > > >>>> is > > >>>>>>>> available for your review at > > >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.1RC0/ > > >>>>>>>> compat-check-report.html > > >>>>>>>> . > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> A list of the 38 issues resolved in this release can be found at > > >>>>>>>> https://s.apache.org/tx1w . > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I > > >>>> will > > >>>>>> try > > >>>>>>>> to close it Friday February 2, 2018 if we have sufficient votes. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Prior to making this announcement I made the following preflight > > >>>>> checks: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> - RAT check passes (7u80) > > >>>>>>>> - Unit test suite passes 10 of 10 iterations (8u131) > > >>>>>>>> - LTT load 1M rows with 100% verification and 20% updates > > >>> (8u131) > > >>>>>>>> - PE sequentialWrite, sequentialRead, randomWrite, randomRead, > > >>>>>>>> scanRange100 (8u131) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>>>>> Andrew > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > > >>>> truth's > > >>>>>>>> decrepit hands > > >>>>>>>> - A23, Crosstalk > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Best regards, > > >>>> Andrew > > >>>> > > >>>> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > truth's > > >>>> decrepit hands > > >>>> - A23, Crosstalk > > >>>> > > >>> > > > -- Best regards, Andrew Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's decrepit hands - A23, Crosstalk
