Thanks to Ted for digging down to find HBASE-19400 as the cause of this one.
@Appy, curious on whether my initial assessment was correct on how we
got here. Would like to know if this was a conscious decision on your
part for flushes :)
On 3/12/18 3:29 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
Table/Namespace/Global Admin sounds fine to me.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
In some $dayjob testing, we've noticed that flushing a table requires
ADMIN permission by virtue of submitting the FlushProcedure (not
consciously about the flush operation itself).
I can see this going both ways, but I felt like ADMIN at the table level
is more appropriate than requiring the global ADMIN permission.
Thoughts?
- Josh
