Yea, I'm not concerned about commons-collections3 v commons-collections4 or whatever the latest libs may be. I'm more concerned about collections4.1 v 4.2 or something like that, and I really hope that we don't have to redo our import statements for each minor release.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > Yeah, all of the commons-* projects worry me. > > Recently, commons-math and commons-collections introduced different GAV > and java-package which give me some hope that they'll be OK going forward. > > Not sure about IO, crypto, and lang.. > > > On 3/16/18 6:19 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > >> commons-collections? I don't know what their minor version compatibility >> story is, but that seems like a place that this could easily come up again >> in the not so distant future. >> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> +1 on protobuf. Any chance we can get a vote period long enough to do a >>> comparison perf / GC test? I can help. >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >>> >>> Probably too risky to do at this stage in the game but protobuf? We're on >>>> 3.3.1. Latest is 3.5.1 [1]: "Various performance optimizations." And >>>> >>> Guava >>> >>>> is 24.1 now. We're on 22. >>>> >>>> St.Ack >>>> 1. https://github.com/google/protobuf/releases >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Give a shout if there's anything that you all think would be good to >>>>> include in a new hbase-thirdparty release for HBase 2.0. >>>>> >>>>> I'm pulling in commons-cli as per https://issues.apache.org/jira >>>>> /browse/HBASE-20201. >>>>> >>>>> If there's more that should come in, please let me know! >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Andrew >>> >>> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's >>> decrepit hands >>> - A23, Crosstalk >>> >>> >>
