On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 5/24/18 11:16 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Mike Drob<md...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Are the two issues (HBASE-20615 and HBASE-19735) conflicting, redundant, >>> or >>> orthogonal? >>> >> I think they're orthogonal, at least as they stand. I think the fact >> that HBASE-19735 doesn't e.g. remove the shell from the main tarball >> is a good way to illustrate that inclusion in one doesn't obviate the >> possibility of inclusion in the other. >> >> That said, if HBASE-19735 lands then we could adapt the testing I'm >> getting in place as a part of HBASE-20331 to check that the generated >> artifact works as expected. If both landed then I'd probably want to >> test both using the same test. >> > > If it makes sense to consolidate, I'd be happy to try to support that too. > > We don't have any outstanding shaded jar issues, do we? I haven't made the > time to circle back around and do more testing.
there are some under the umbrella HBASE-20331
