+1 (non-binding)

- Signature, checksum: OK
- Rat check: OK
- Build from source: OK
- Unit tests: OK
- LTT 1M rows: OK
- Master UI: OK
- Basic shell ops: OK

Thanks.
Peter

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 3:21 AM Zach York <zyork.contribut...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> - checked sums and sigs: Ok
> - Rat check: Ok
> - built from source: Ok (8u92)
> - Ran unit tests: Ok
> - Messed around with some basic shell commands: Ok
> - Loaded and read 1M rows with LTT: Ok
> - Sanity checked Web UI: Ok
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 9:11 PM Tak-Lon (Stephen) Wu <taklo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> >
> >    - checked sums and signatures: ok
> >    - Rat check (8u181):  ok
> >       - mvn apache-rat:check
> >    - built from source: ok (8u181)
> >       - mvn clean install -DskipTests
> >    - Unit tests pass: ok (8u181)
> >       - mvn test -P runAllTests
> >       - [nit] TestRegionInfoDisplay.testRegionDetailsForDisplay failed
> >       once, but the second time it passed. the error was:
> >          -   [ERROR]
>  TestRegionInfoDisplay.testRegionDetailsForDisplay:78
> >          expected:<...:31 UTC 2018 (PT0.00[5]S ago), server=null> but
> > was:<...:31
> >          UTC 2018 (PT0.00[6]S ago), server=null>
> >       - 1 node HBase cluster test on Hadoop-2.8.4
> >       - WEB UI (8u181): checked Procedures/Process Metrics/Table
> >       Details/Home looks correct
> >       - basic HBase shell command
> >       [create/put/get/scan/flush/list/disable/drop] (8u181) : ok
> >       - Loaded 1M rows with LTT (8u181):  ok
> >          - hbase ltt -tn TestTable -write 10:16 -num_keys 1000000
> >          - hbase ltt -tn TestTable -read 100 -num_keys 1000000
> >
> > -Stephen
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 2:25 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm +1
> > >
> > > 10B ITBLL w/ slow deterministic just completed and verified on my
> little
> > > 6node cluster.
> > >
> > > Nightlies are pretty good. #540 is when the last commits for 2.1.1 went
> > in
> > > and ignoring the cancelled, ~50% passed:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.1/
> > >
> > > S
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 11:29 AM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The first release candidate for Apache HBase 2.1.1 (RC0) is available
> > > > for download and testing. This is a bug fix release with 180+ commits
> > [1]
> > > > since hbase-2.1.0. Release notes are available here [2]. The
> > > compatibility
> > > > report is at [3].
> > > >
> > > > Artifacts are available here:
> > > >
> > > >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.1.1RC0/
> > > >
> > > > Corresponding convenience artifacts for maven use are in the staging
> > > > repository:
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1235
> > > >
> > > > All artifacts are signed with my code signing key, 8ACC93D2, which is
> > > > also in the project KEYS file:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/hbase/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > These artifacts correspond to commit ref
> > > >
> > > >  b60a92d6864ef27295027f5961cb46f9162d7637
> > > >
> > > > which has been tagged as 2.1.1RC0.
> > > >
> > > > Nightlies are looking pretty good:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.1/
> > > >
> > > > Please take a few minutes to verify the release and vote on releasing
> > it:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts as Apache HBase 2.1.1
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > >
> > > > This VOTE thread will remain open for at least 72 hours. It will
> close
> > > > for sure
> > > > Wednesday night (10/31).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > S
> > > >
> > > > 1.
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.1.1RC0/CHANGES.md
> > > > 2.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.1.1RC0/RELEASENOTES.md
> > > >
> > > > P.S. Compatibility report is taking time. Will be back with it later
> > > today.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stephen Wu | Indiana University, Bloomington
> >
>

Reply via email to