We will only remove the hadoop 2.x support from hbase 3.x, which does not
have a formal release plan yet, for 2.x we will still support hadoop 2.x.

Wei-Chiu Chuang <[email protected]> 于2019年12月26日周四 上午8:57写道:

> With my Hadoop hat's on, we have not yet officially declared Hadoop 2.8
> EOL. I think the 2.8 download missing from the web page is just a mistake.
>
> That being said, some of the biggest Hadoop users (LinkedIn, Yahoo,
> Microsoft) that I am aware of are moving up from 2.7/2.8 to 2.10, and that
> 2.8.5 (the last version in the 2.8 line) was released in Sep 2018, more
> than a year ago. It doesn't look like the community has the desire to
> continue the 2.8 line.
>
> I think it is a little extreme to remove hadoop2 profile, given that Hadoop
> 2.9 and 2.10 are still active and I expect Hadoop 2 to stay around for at
> least 2 years out.
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 8:41 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hadoop 2.8.x has been removed from the download page of hadoop so I think
> > it is time to bump the hadoop dependency to 2.9.x, on master an branch-2.
> >
> > And the hadoop community is going to make 2.10.x the last minor release
> > line for 2.x
> >
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/cab84265d632b90d66dcd1ad957a7439a2c76a987c7e62feafb4812e%40%3Ccommon-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E
> >
> >
> > I think this is a sign that the community is moving forward to 3.x. So I
> > propose we make the master branch hadoop3 only, This requires changing
> the
> > pom a bit to active hadoop3 profile by default and remove the hadoop2
> > profile.
> >
> > Thoughts? Thanks.
> >
>

Reply via email to