And even the latest 2.9.x release, 2.9.2, was released at 2018 Nov, which is also more than a year. Is this branch still alive?
Thanks. 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> 于2019年12月26日周四 上午9:37写道： > We will only remove the hadoop 2.x support from hbase 3.x, which does not > have a formal release plan yet, for 2.x we will still support hadoop 2.x. > > Wei-Chiu Chuang <[email protected]> 于2019年12月26日周四 上午8:57写道： > >> With my Hadoop hat's on, we have not yet officially declared Hadoop 2.8 >> EOL. I think the 2.8 download missing from the web page is just a mistake. >> >> That being said, some of the biggest Hadoop users (LinkedIn, Yahoo, >> Microsoft) that I am aware of are moving up from 2.7/2.8 to 2.10, and that >> 2.8.5 (the last version in the 2.8 line) was released in Sep 2018, more >> than a year ago. It doesn't look like the community has the desire to >> continue the 2.8 line. >> >> I think it is a little extreme to remove hadoop2 profile, given that >> Hadoop >> 2.9 and 2.10 are still active and I expect Hadoop 2 to stay around for at >> least 2 years out. >> >> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 8:41 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hadoop 2.8.x has been removed from the download page of hadoop so I >> think >> > it is time to bump the hadoop dependency to 2.9.x, on master an >> branch-2. >> > >> > And the hadoop community is going to make 2.10.x the last minor release >> > line for 2.x >> > >> > >> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/cab84265d632b90d66dcd1ad957a7439a2c76a987c7e62feafb4812e%40%3Ccommon-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E >> > >> > >> > I think this is a sign that the community is moving forward to 3.x. So I >> > propose we make the master branch hadoop3 only, This requires changing >> the >> > pom a bit to active hadoop3 profile by default and remove the hadoop2 >> > profile. >> > >> > Thoughts? Thanks. >> > >> >
