Big +1 from me. This is a big step for making HBase more cloud native.
I've already rebased HBASE-26067 to the latest master. Thanks~ Ankit Singhal <an...@apache.org> 于2021年12月17日周五 07:17写道： > +1 > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:53 PM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Andor > > > > > > > > > On 2021. Dec 16., at 22:30, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > I'm extremely pleased to send this official vote to merge the feature > > branch for HBASE-26067[1] into master and backport into branch-2 (2.x, > not > > 2.5.x). This feature branch introduces the pluggable StoreFileTracker > > interface. > > > > > > The StoreFileTracker allows the StoreFileEngine to be decoupled from > > where the HFiles can be found. The DEFAULT implementation of this > > StoreFileTracker (e.g. files in a family's directory) is still the > default > > implementation. This merge would introduce a FILE implementation which > uses > > a flat-file in each column family to track the files which make up this > > Store. This feature is notable for HBase as it invalidate the need for > > HBOSS (a distributed locking layer in hbase-filesystem) when Amazon S3 is > > used for HBase data. > > > > > > We had a DISCUSS thread [2] in which the overall sentiment was positive > > to merge. > > > > > > Covering some high-level details/FAQ on this work: > > > * Wellington and Szabolcs have successfully run ITBLL with Chaos > Monkies > > using this feature. > > > * YCSB (load) indicates a slight performance improvement when using S3 > > as the storage system for HBase as compared to using HBOSS [3] > > > * A new section was added to the HBase book which covers the feature > and > > how to use it. > > > * There is some follow-on work expected, tracked in HBASE-26584 [4], > > which includes things like making user consumption easier and additional > > metrics to measure effectiveness of the feature. > > > > > > As is customary, this vote will be open for at least 3 days (2021/12/19 > > 2130 GMT). We'll follow the standard ASF lazy-consensus rules for code > > modification (though I do not expect to need the lazy-consensus caveat). > > Please vote: > > > > > > +1: Merge the changes from HBASE-26067 to master and branch-2 > > > -1: Do not merge these changes because ... > > > > > > Big thank you to all of the super hard work that Duo, Wellington, and > > Szabolcs have put into this feature. > > > > > > - Josh > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26067 > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6dblom3tc2oz05d263pvmrywlthqq1c1 > > > [3] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26067?focusedCommentId=17448499&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17448499 > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26584 > > > > >
