+1 (non-binding)

Regards,
Pankaj

On Sat, Dec 18, 2021, 2:35 AM Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote:

> I guess I forgot to vote :)
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 12/17/21 8:57 AM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> > Big +1 from me.
> >
> > This is a big step for making HBase more cloud native.
> >
> > I've already rebased HBASE-26067 to the latest master.
> >
> > Thanks~
> >
> > Ankit Singhal <an...@apache.org> 于2021年12月17日周五 07:17写道:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:53 PM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> Andor
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On 2021. Dec 16., at 22:30, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi!
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm extremely pleased to send this official vote to merge the feature
> >>> branch for HBASE-26067[1] into master and backport into branch-2 (2.x,
> >> not
> >>> 2.5.x). This feature branch introduces the pluggable StoreFileTracker
> >>> interface.
> >>>>
> >>>> The StoreFileTracker allows the StoreFileEngine to be decoupled from
> >>> where the HFiles can be found. The DEFAULT implementation of this
> >>> StoreFileTracker (e.g. files in a family's directory) is still the
> >> default
> >>> implementation. This merge would introduce a FILE implementation which
> >> uses
> >>> a flat-file in each column family to track the files which make up this
> >>> Store. This feature is notable for HBase as it invalidate the need for
> >>> HBOSS (a distributed locking layer in hbase-filesystem) when Amazon S3
> is
> >>> used for HBase data.
> >>>>
> >>>> We had a DISCUSS thread [2] in which the overall sentiment was
> positive
> >>> to merge.
> >>>>
> >>>> Covering some high-level details/FAQ on this work:
> >>>> * Wellington and Szabolcs have successfully run ITBLL with Chaos
> >> Monkies
> >>> using this feature.
> >>>> * YCSB (load) indicates a slight performance improvement when using S3
> >>> as the storage system for HBase as compared to using HBOSS [3]
> >>>> * A new section was added to the HBase book which covers the feature
> >> and
> >>> how to use it.
> >>>> * There is some follow-on work expected, tracked in HBASE-26584 [4],
> >>> which includes things like making user consumption easier and
> additional
> >>> metrics to measure effectiveness of the feature.
> >>>>
> >>>> As is customary, this vote will be open for at least 3 days
> (2021/12/19
> >>> 2130 GMT). We'll follow the standard ASF lazy-consensus rules for code
> >>> modification (though I do not expect to need the lazy-consensus
> caveat).
> >>> Please vote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1: Merge the changes from HBASE-26067 to master and branch-2
> >>>> -1: Do not merge these changes because ...
> >>>>
> >>>> Big thank you to all of the super hard work that Duo, Wellington, and
> >>> Szabolcs have put into this feature.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Josh
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26067
> >>>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6dblom3tc2oz05d263pvmrywlthqq1c1
> >>>> [3]
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26067?focusedCommentId=17448499&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17448499
> >>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26584
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to