https://selfserve.apache.org/jira-account.html

The INFRA team has delivered a self serving tool for requesting a jira
account, so contributors could request a jira account by their own.

I filed HBASE-27689 for updating the README.md to mention this change and
the PR is ready

https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5088

PTAL.

Thanks.

Guanghao Zhang <zghao...@gmail.com> 于2022年12月7日周三 12:35写道:

> Did other projects have the same solution for this, sync github issues to
> jira issues? Github issues will be useful to get more feedback.
>
> 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2022年12月6日周二 00:13写道:
>
> > The PR for HBASE-27513 is available
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4913
> >
> > Let's at least tell our users to send email to private@hbase for
> > acquiring a jira account.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2022年12月2日周五 12:46写道:
> > >
> > > Currently all the comment on github PR will be sent to issues@hbase,
> > > like this one
> > >
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/jbfm269b4m24xl2r82l8b0t3pmqr44hr
> > >
> > > But I think this can only be used as an archive, to make sure that all
> > > discussions are recorded on asf infrastructure.
> > >
> > > For github issues, I'm afraid we can only do the same thing. As the
> > > format of github comment is different, it will be hard to read if we
> > > just sync the message to jira...
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudrea...@hubspot.com.invalid> 于2022年12月1日周四
> > 21:30写道:
> > > >
> > > > Should we have them sent to private@? Just thinking in terms of
> > reducing
> > > > spam to users who put their email and full name on a public list.
> > > >
> > > > One thought I had about bug tracking is whether we could use some
> sort
> > of
> > > > github -> jira sync. I've seen them used before, where it
> automatically
> > > > syncs issues and comments between the two systems. It's definitely
> not
> > > > ideal, but maybe an option? I'm guessing it would require INFRA help.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 5:47 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I've filed HBASE-27513 for changing the readme on github.
> > > > >
> > > > > At least let's reuse the existing mailing list for acquiring jira
> > account.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2022年11月29日周二 22:34写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bump and also send this to user@hbase.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We need to find a way to deal with the current situation where
> > > > > > contributors can not create a Jira account on their own...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At least, we need to change the readme on github page, web site
> and
> > > > > > also the ref guide to tell users how to acquire a jira account...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2022年11月27日周日 22:06写道:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For me, I think most developers already have a github account,
> so
> > > > > > > enabling it could help us get more feedback. For lots of
> younger
> > > > > > > Chinese developers, they rarely use email in their daily
> life...
> > > > > > > No doubt later we need to modify our readme on github. If we
> > just let
> > > > > > > users go to github issues on the readme, they will soon open an
> > issue
> > > > > > > there. But if we ask users to first send an email to a mailing
> > list,
> > > > > > > for acquiring a jira account, and then wait for a PMC member to
> > submit
> > > > > > > the request, and receive the email response, set up their
> > account, and
> > > > > > > then they can finally open an issue on jira. I'm afraid lots of
> > users
> > > > > > > will just give up, it is not very friendly...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And I do not mean separate issue systems for users and devs.
> > Users can
> > > > > > > still open jira issues or ask in the mailing list if they want,
> > github
> > > > > > > issues is just another channel. If a user asks something in the
> > > > > > > mailing list and we think it is a bug, we will ask the user to
> > file an
> > > > > > > issue or we will file an issue for it. It is just the same with
> > github
> > > > > > > issues.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> 于2022年11月24日周四 15:44写道:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This new situation around JIRA seems very similar to the
> > existing
> > > > > situation
> > > > > > > > around Slack. A new community member currently must acquire a
> > Slack
> > > > > invite
> > > > > > > > somehow, usually by emailing one of the lists. Mailing lists
> > > > > themselves
> > > > > > > > involve a signup process, though it may be possible to email
> > > > > user/-zh/dev
> > > > > > > > without first subscribing to the list.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have a -0 opinion on using GitHub Issues to manage JIRA
> > > > > subscription
> > > > > > > > access. It seems like a comical cascade of complexity. I’d
> > prefer to
> > > > > keep
> > > > > > > > GitHub Issues available to us as a future alternative to JIRA
> > for
> > > > > project
> > > > > > > > issue tracking. I agree with you that migrating away from
> JIRA
> > will
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > painful.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I’m not a big fan of having separate issue systems for users
> > vs.
> > > > > devs. It
> > > > > > > > emphasizes the idea that users and devs are different groups
> of
> > > > > people with
> > > > > > > > unequal voice in the project direction. I suppose it could be
> > done
> > > > > well,
> > > > > > > > but I think it is more likely to be done poorly.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I follow the Infra list, but only casually. It seems there’s
> a
> > plan
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > eventually adopt some Atlassian Cloud service, which has
> better
> > > > > anti-spam
> > > > > > > > controls. If that is on the roadmap, I’m content to let JIRA
> > access
> > > > > follow
> > > > > > > > Slack access: using some existing outreach to request access.
> > > > > Introducing a
> > > > > > > > dedicated list would be fine with me as well.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -n
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 03:19 Duo Zhang <zhang...@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I've forwarded an announcement email from the INFRA team
> > recently
> > > > > > > > > about disabling the public sign ups for jira.a.o because of
> > > > > spamming.
> > > > > > > > > And now the rule is finally applied, when you open
> jira.a.o,
> > you
> > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > see there is a gray bar on the top to tell you 'Public
> > signup for
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > instance is disabled. Our Jira Guidelines page explains how
> > to get
> > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > account.'.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For me, I do not think it is easy for us to completely drop
> > jira
> > > > > since
> > > > > > > > > it is the issue tracker we have been using for years and
> all
> > our
> > > > > > > > > release processes are bound to it. So at least we need to
> > find a
> > > > > way
> > > > > > > > > to let our contributors know how to acquire a jira account.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The hive project decided to use a dedicated mailing list
> for
> > > > > acquiring
> > > > > > > > > a jira account.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/HowToContribute#HowToContribute-JIRA
> > > > > <
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/HowToContribute#HowToContribute-JIRA
> > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For me, I think maybe we could enable github issues for our
> > users
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > contributors. They can ask questions and report issues
> there
> > and
> > > > > if we
> > > > > > > > > think it is a bug that needs to be fixed, we could open a
> > jira
> > > > > issue
> > > > > > > > > for it. And we could also create a special issue template
> for
> > > > > > > > > acquiring jira accounts.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to