[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12573742#action_12573742
]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on HTTPCLIENT-746:
----------------------------------------------
Stojce,
Would you mind using maps of objects (Map<String, Object>) instead of maps of
lists of strings (Map<String, List<String>>)? In my opinion this would make the
API somewhat less cumbersome, especially for simple cases. If an object is an
instance of Collection, you could still treat it as such, whereas
non-collection objects would be simply converted to their textual
representation with Object#toString? Could you live with that?
Could please also update the ClientFormLogin sample?
Oleg
> substitute for URLUtils.java
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: HTTPCLIENT-746
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-746
> Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: HttpClient
> Reporter: Stojce Dimski
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0 Alpha 4
>
> Attachments: urlEncoded.patch, UrlEncodedUtils.zip
>
>
> I would like to contribute a substitute for existing URLUtils.java...
> UrlEncodedUtils.java offer utility methods for dealing with 'urlencoded'
> data. Main difference with existing class is that parameters are Map <String,
> List <String>> instead of NameValue pairs and lack of third party
> dependencies... It's partially covered with tests which I will further
> extend to cover all methods of this utility class.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
