On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 13:29 +0100, sebb wrote: > On 05/07/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Author: olegk > > Date: Sat Jul 5 05:18:54 2008 > > New Revision: 674186 > >
... > > > > Modified: > > httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/src/main/java/org/apache/http/impl/conn/tsccm/BasicPoolEntryRef.java > > URL: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/src/main/java/org/apache/http/impl/conn/tsccm/BasicPoolEntryRef.java?rev=674186&r1=674185&r2=674186&view=diff > > > > ============================================================================== > > --- > > httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/src/main/java/org/apache/http/impl/conn/tsccm/BasicPoolEntryRef.java > > (original) > > +++ > > httpcomponents/httpclient/trunk/module-client/src/main/java/org/apache/http/impl/conn/tsccm/BasicPoolEntryRef.java > > Sat Jul 5 05:18:54 2008 > > @@ -76,18 +76,5 @@ > > return this.route; > > } > > > > - > > - /* * > > - * Indicates whether this reference is still valid. > > - * > > - * @return <code>true</code> if the pool entry is still referenced, > > - * <code>false</code> otherwise > > - * / > > - public final boolean isValid() { > > - //@@@ better sematics: allow explicit invalidation > > - return (super.get() != null); > > - } > > - */ > > - > > Was the removal of that method intentional? > > It's not mentioned in the log message... > Sebastian, This method was commented out. I thought it was pointless to keep it. Oleg > > } // class BasicPoolEntryRef > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
