On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:02 -0400, Sam Berlin wrote: > I noticed that the recent fix to multipart is dependent on a snapshot > of mime4j. If we go BETA1 for HttpClient, does that also freeze the > API of the mime component? Is that OK if it's dependent on a snapshot > release of mime4j? >
I think it is not. However, chances are good mime4j version 0.4 will be released soon. In the worst case we could ship HttpClient 4.0-beta1 without HttpMime What's your feeling about the API of HttpClient proper? Is there anything else worth delaying the release for? Oleg > Sam > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Folks > > > > There are no feature requests / open bugs targeted for BETA1 left. How > > do you feel about the current state of HttpClient's API? It is good > > enough to move to the BETA phase? Does anybody want to spend more time > > refining the API? > > > > What should be the plan now? > > > > Oleg > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
