On 12 January 2011 00:23, Jon Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yep, I've got all that pending in a commit, will commit tomorrow morning.
> Should we put a note in the ChangeLog about it?

Yes please.

> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:21 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 11 January 2011 20:43, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:14 +0000, Moore, Jonathan wrote:
>> >> Well, it didn't take me that long to do, and if we aren't just going to
>> >> remove the deprecated method, I wanted to be able to sleep at night. :)
>> >>
>> >> If we don't want to include code like this then I think we should just
>> >> remove the deprecated method, because even if we remain binary
>> >> backwards-compatible for one of these folks, the caching module won't
>> work
>> >> for them properly (they'll get UnsupportedOperationExceptions) and
>> they'll
>> >> have to upgrade to the new API anyway. I'd rather have that discovery
>> >> happen for them at compile time than at runtime, to be frank.
>> >>
>> >> So I guess I'm coming around to: I think we should remove this method
>> >> which only appeared publicly in a beta release and for which I think
>> there
>> >> is a high probability there are exactly zero people who will actually
>> have
>> >> stuff break if we remove it.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> >>
>> >
>> > That is a lot of unnecessary code. Let's just remove it along with the
>> > deprecated method, and move on.
>>
>> There's also a corresponding deprecated ctor.
>> Also the variantURIs private field.
>>
>> > Oleg
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ........
> Jon Moore
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to