On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Dmitry Potapov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gentlemen, > > Have you came to any conclusion concerning this? > Currently AbstractMultiworkerIOReactor.execute(...) has finally block which > calls doShutdown() which can throw exception itself (see HTTPCORE-376), so > all information about current exception will be lost. > One of the ways to fix this and have information concerning both exception > is > to use suppressed exceptions idiom implemented in Java 7 (probably with > conjunction with try-with-resources), so I wish to know is it allowed to > use > Java 7 features in future patches. > I do not think this has come up. I would be OK with Java 7 for trunk. Oleg? Gary > > -- > Thanks in advance, > Dmitry Potapov > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 03:00:30PM +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 07:52 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > On Sep 14, 2013, at 7:23, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 17:25 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > >> HttpClient 4.2 and 4.3 requires Java 5. > > > >> > > > >> Which components are you talking about? > > > >> > > > >> Gary > > > > > > > > I think the question is whether or not we should retain 1.5 > > > > compatibility for the next release series. > > > > > > > > I believe that 1.5 compatibility is becoming pointless. It is getting > > > > increasingly difficult to maintain while hardly helping us expand our > > > > user base. As far as know there is no even official way of obtaining > a > > > > 1.5 JDK from Oracle. > > > > > > > > However having said all that I also have to admit that Java 1.6 does > not > > > > really bring a lot in terms of new features. We probably should also > > > > consider upgrading straight to Java 1.7 in order to get full try with > > > > resources support and NIO2. > > > > > > > > I suggest that we take this discussion to the user list and start a > poll > > > > on a minimal JRE level for the next release series. > > > > > > It seems to me that 4.2.x and 4.3.x should stay on Java 5 and we can > > > go to 6 or 7 for 4.4. > > > > > > > > That goes without saying. 4.2 is no longer being actively developed and > > 4.3 stays Java 1.5 compatible. > > > > Oleg > > > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Ryan McKinley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Now that a release is out, is it worth asking about 1.5 support? > > > >>> > > > >>> Obviously we should not change the system requirements unless > there is a > > > >>> clear gain. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thoughts? > > > >>> > > > >>> ryan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
