On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 15:13 +0100, Michael Osipov wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 12:42 +0100, Michael Osipov wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 23:27 +0000, sebb wrote: > > > > > On 19 November 2015 at 21:17, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Am 2015-11-19 um 12:32 schrieb Oleg Kalnichevski:
... > > > > Would this be all right for everyone? > > > > > > > > org.apache.hc.core5.http > > > > > > Why do you want to use the redundant 'http'? > > > > While not very likely we might have non HTTP protocol support as well, > > such as Websockets. > > I see but WebSockets share no common code with HTTP except the initial > handshake. > I would rather see this as another top level project because HttpClient's API > is > highly optimized for HTTP and not a general-purpose one like Commons VFS. > Project charter allows us to pursue development of a component toolset 'focused on HTTP and associated protocols'. I also can well imagine SSL related components being in a separate namespace like 'org.apache.hc.core5.ssl' Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
